Stalking the requirement not to stalk

Stalking the requirement not to stalk - Printable Version

+- tapatalk (https://tapatalk.sorcerytime.com)
+-- Forum: ALL (https://tapatalk.sorcerytime.com/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Art of Stalking (https://tapatalk.sorcerytime.com/forum-22.html)
+--- Thread: Stalking the requirement not to stalk (/thread-20707.html)

Stalking the requirement not to stalk - shamanka - 02-08-2014

went onto FB a few months ago....saw id been added to a 'stalkers' group...i went in and had this great flow..so thought id share here...hehehe

status of entry: moi... i dont know who added me...but im here

JS:the thingy bobber says you were added by ..........., 3 months ago.. took u a minute .. haha

ME:hmm. it only showed up as a group
yesterday...maybe it got moved up as i
deleted my involvement with some others...oh
well, what are you guys about?

JS Confused

talking of course! lol
according to the about "Some have a natural
disposition to dreaming while for others theirs
is stalking - The purpose of this group is to
recall our waking experience with a view to
discussion, dissemination, and recapitulation
on the practical application of the Art of
Stalking. Hopefully we can gain insights into
its techniques, bring forth our dreaming
experience into waking life, identify the
attributes that create a good stalker, and bring
understanding to how stalking links us with
INTENT."

ME Confused

o really the intent is to not require to stalk
anymore?

JS: lol no not at all. it's to help each other
understand stalking.. so much emphasis has
went into teaching people dreaming. but
stalking is clouded in mystery.. although i'm
not sure this group has helped much.. but
who knows. perhaps it has.. it helped me
stalk myself. but that's a whole nother story.
.hahaha

ME: one asks any question..that is a stalk....to
stalk to make the unknown...known, then
because we aim to be fluid, 'to accept without
accepting or believe without believing'..we
drop that known back into the unknown
again....therefore to continue stalking what we
inevitably know is unknown anyway...why not
accept its all unknown..and give up
stalking?...

JS: lol. sounds much easier

ME: lolol actually its a process..one actually has to
know, to drop it back into the unknown, to
become the totality of self, if that is the aim
here, with the knowing its actually a folly to
begin with, then maybe my double belongs
here.it could participate..however, as a stalker,
aiming to come into the realm of
conscientious elder, in the next 10 years, can
i afford the indulgence of playing?. To be
clear, i can play the folly of being a stalker
here for the group, however my
predispositions may not be to everyone's
taste. to that i would remain
unconcerned.therefore unless one wishes to
include a stalker who is only interested in the
folly of stalking, for others to gain that folly and
then drop it into the unknown may not be
welcome...so it seems its down to intent, and
as a being with unbending intent, such
stalking practices would be utilized to their
fullest capacity, as is the nature of the stalker,
with the indifference of one, that has actually
dropped stalking,and would be indulging in
that folly, for the hell of it....it could be fun...as
long as i'm clear with my intent in this matter..i
remain impeccable.

JS: i'm not sure i understand everything you're
saying. but i understand a lot of it..
i personally (i don't know about the rest of the
group) would be honored to learn from you

ME: hahaha i'm not that important...hehehe

JS: no. you're just as important or not important
as anything else.. you're right about that. but
you are wise and much more knowledgeable
and experienced then i

ME i know nothing...but the folly of everything,
therefore i can host anything, but the being of
something....

JS: i barely know you. but i love you. lol

ME:my deep affection emits, but i feel nothing,
the detachment leads to unconditional
connection to your nagual being and to its
path of freedom....in service.....

JS: en lakech

Stalking the requirement not to stalk - Guest - 02-08-2014

I agree, there is usefulness in knowing how to not stalk/detach/be unconcerned. Allow the flow of the universe to take over from a certain point, a point in the height of being involved and concerned.

However there is a difference between thinking one is one thing and actually being it.

Stalking the requirement not to stalk - Guest - 02-08-2014

For example, I see myself as a

Am I really that? Maybe on some imaginary level, if I turn my seeing upside down and inside out, I might see something which resembles a unicorn. Yet, I am not that, yet I am. Is there a separation between the duality of concern and non-concern? Does it go back to the 'it's one, not two' approach?

I think I know the answer, but do I really?

Stalking the requirement not to stalk - Guest - 08-21-2019