+- tapatalk (https://tapatalk.sorcerytime.com)
+-- Forum: ALL (https://tapatalk.sorcerytime.com/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Exploring (https://tapatalk.sorcerytime.com/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: Critical Thinking (/thread-21221.html)
Critical Thinking - snowblind - 03-15-2010
This is the Russian perspective on earth changes. Hard
facts that are going
unreported in America.The atmospheres of the planets
are changing. Dr.
Dmitriev's work shows that the planets themselves are
changing. They are
undergoing changes in their atmospheres.
For example the Martian atmosphere is getting sizably
thicker than it was
before. The Mars observer probe in 1997 lost one of
its mirrors, which
caused it to crash, because the atmosphere was about
twice as dense as they
calculated, and basically the wind on that little
mirror was so high that
it blew it right off the device.
Earth's moon is growing an atmosphere
Also, the moon is growing an atmosphere that's made up
of a compound
Dmitriev refers to as ''Natrium.'' Dmitriev says that,
around the moon,
Natrium is the latin word for salt,
which turns to vapor 97.42 kJ·mol−1
there is this 6,000-kilometer-deep layer of Natrium
that wasn't there before.
6,000k =
3 728miles that would make it a very deep atmosphere, considering
earth’s atmosphere is estimated at 1000km or 621 miles
And we're having this kind of change in Earth's
atmosphere in the upper
levels, where HO gas is forming that wasn't there
HO is not a gas it is an alcohol
group on a molecule, as in EtOH or ethanol, which denotes an alcohol
group
before; it simply did not
exist in the quantity that it does now. It's not
related to global warming
and it's not related to CFCs or fluorocarbon emissions
or any of that
stuff. It's just showing up.
Magnetic fields and brightness of the planets are
changing. The planets are
experiencing sizable changes in their overall
brightness. Venus, for
example, is showing us marked increases in its overall
brightness. Jupiter
has gotten to have such a high energetic charge that
there is actually a
visible tube of ionizing radiation that's formed
between its moon, Io. You
can actually see the luminous energy tube in
photographs that have been
taken more recently..
Are these photos taken from earth
or from space? It is possible that the
brightness is due to atmospheric changes on earth, ie: a clear night, after a
rain will make the stars and planets appear more clear
And the planets are having a change in their fields.
The magnetic fields
are becoming stronger. Jupiter's magnetic field has
more than doubled.
Uranus's magnetic field is changing. Neptune's
magnetic field is
increasing. These planets are becoming brighter. Their
magnetic field
strength is getting higher. Their atmospheric
qualities are changing.
Magnetic shifts are common on every planet and are usually
benign. We have shifted on our axis by
3 inches since the Chilean earthquake. Our magnetic field reverses about every
200k years and the time between the reversals the magnetic field fluctuates
greatly.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... _flip.html
to find out more.
Uranus and Neptune appear to have had recent pole
shifts. When the Voyager
2 space probe flew past Uranus and Neptune, the
apparent north and south
magnetic poles were sizably offset from where the
rotational pole was. In
one case, it was 50 degrees off, and in the other case
the difference was
around 40 degrees, both of which are pretty big
changes.
There could be many pole shifts on
other planets depending on what materials the core of the planet consists
of. Magnetic fields are caused by the
metallic contents of the molten core of a planet spinning, just like an
alternator. Nothing more nothing less
The overall changes could essentially be broken down
into three categories:
Energy field changes, luminosity changes, and
atmospheric changes.
Overall volcanic activity has increased 500 percent
since
1975
The methodology of reporting
volcanic activity changed in 1974, which could have effected reporting of
volcanic activity
http://www.volcano.si.edu...cfm#ExplanationofContent
On the Earth, we're
seeing the changes even more
completely.
For example, Michael Mandeville has done research that
has shown that the
overall volcanic activity on the Earth since
1875 has increased by roughly 500 percent. The overall
earthquake activity
has increased by 400 percent just since
1973.
Natural disasters increased 410 percent between 1963
and
1993
Dr. Dmitriev did a very elaborate calculation of
natural disasters. He
showed that if you compare the years 1963 through
1993, the overall amount
of natural disasters of all different kinds - whether
you are talking
hurricanes, typhoons, mud slides, tidal waves, you
name it - have increased
by 410 percent.
The Sun's magnetic field increased by 230 percent
since
1901
This phenomenon could be attributed
to the cyclical nature of the universe…not to some end time apocalypse. What statistical measure did Dr. Dmitriev
use?
There's a study by Dr. Mike Lockwood from Rutherford
******on National
Laboratories in California, who has been investigating
the Sun. He has
discovered that since 1901, the overall magnetic field
of the Sun has
become 230 percent stronger than it was before.
Before when? And is it a cyclical change?
http://www.atmos.washington.edu/2009Q1/ ... trends.pdf
fascinating reading
More than just Earth Changes
So, all in all, what we're seeing is a lot more than
just what they call
Earth Changes. Some people get into the idea that
there is an interaction
between the Earth and the Sun that's going on here.
Very, very few people
are aware of the work that is being done in the
Russian National Academy of
Sciences in Siberia, specifically in Novosibirsk,
where they are doing this
research. They've come to the conclusion that the only
possible thing that
could be causing this energetic change all throughout
the Solar System is
that we are moving into an area of energy that is
different - that is higher.
Very exotic, spooky, and of course untraceable, and
unpublished making it absolutely irrefutable.
These “facts” should be immediately suspect. I suspect this is another “Photon Belt” insinuation. Insinuated because it has been debunked.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon_belt
The glowing plasma at the leading edge of our Solar
System has recently
increased 1000 percent
Now, check this out. The Sun itself has a magnetic
field, of course, and
that magnetic field creates an egg around the Solar
System, which is known
as the heliosphere. The heliosphere is shaped like a
teardrop, with the
long and thin end of the drop pointing in the opposite
direction from the
direction that we're traveling. It's just like a
comet, where the tail is
always pointing away from the Sun.
Factually incorrect. The Heliosphere is shaped like a ballerina
skirt
http://en.wikipedia.org/w...eliospheric_current_sheet
The Russians have looked at the leading edge of this
heliosphere, and they
have observed glowing, excited plasma energy there.
This plasma energy used
to be 10 astronomical units deep (an astronomical unit
is the distance from
the Earth to the Sun, 93,000,000 miles). So ten
astronomical units
represents the normal thickness of this glowing energy
that we used to see
at the front end of the Solar System.
Today, that glowing plasma has gone to 100
astronomical units deep.
Although Dmitriev's paper does not give an exact
timeline, we can assume (Why can we assume
anything? There are no events to
substantiate this claim, only assumption)
that this increase happened in the same 1963 to 1993
period as the increase
he found in natural disasters. Whenever it happened,
that's a 1,000 percent
increase in the overall brightness of the energy at
the front end of the
Solar System. (Reference? Or assumption?)
And this means that the Solar System itself is moving
into an area where
the energy is more highly charged. That higher-
charged energy is in turn
exciting the plasma and causing more of it to form, so
you see more
luminosity, more brightness. This energy is then
flowing into the Sun,
which in turn emits the energy and spreads it out
along its equatorial
plane, which is called the Ecliptic.
The Ecliptic is is the apparent
path that the Sun traces out in the sky during the year, appearing to move eastwards on an imaginary
spherical surface, the celestial sphere, relative to the (almost) fixed
stars. In more accurate terms, it is the intersection of the celestial
sphere with the ecliptic plane, which is the geometric plane containing the mean orbit of the Earth around the Sun. (The ecliptic plane
should be distinguished from the invariable
plane of the solar system, which is perpendicular to the vector sum of the angular
momenta of all planetary orbital planes, to which Jupiter is the
main contributor. The present ecliptic plane is inclined to the invariable
plane by about 1.5°.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecliptic
This in turn is saturating interplanetary space, which
causes the solar
emissions to travel more quickly and charge up the
energy on the planets.
And this is conscious energy that is changing how
the
planet works, how it
functions, and what kind of life it supports. The
harmonics of the DNA
spiral itself are altering. That's the real, hidden
cause of spontaneous
mass evolutions in previous epochs of time.
What does this mean? That the energy at play in the universe is
conscious? What are the harmonics of
DNA? Mass evolutions? There have been pockets of evolution that we
do not know about?
All this is happening all at the same time, and it's
all working up to a
crescendo where there is going to be a sudden shift.
In other words, we will get to the point where we are
so far into the new
level of energy that there will be a sudden expansion
of the basic harmonic
wavelengths that the Sun emits as it radiates energy
out of itself. This
increase in energy emission will change the basic
nature of all matter in
the Solar System. The planets are pushed slightly
farther away from the Sun
and the atoms and molecules that make them up actually
expand in terms of
their physical size.
References please, I have not heard of any of this work.
Ok, Im not trying to be a complete
**** about all of this…but is anyone really reading with a critical eye some
of the **** that is out there? No
wonder the “new age” movement makes us all look like a bunch of blissed out
buffoons…because we sound like that.
None of this is based in any real science. This is word salad. How
are we going to make a difference if we have no credibility? And Yes, this irritates me to no end. Why?
Because we know that something has changed, and we struggle to explain
it. I am advocating that we educate
ourselves to at least be critical ESPECIALLY about things that are this “out
there” so we don’t sound like a bunch of idiots spouting that the sky is
falling.
Galileo Galilei: "I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God
who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to
forgo their use."_______________________________________________
Critical Thinking - Summer Dawne - 03-15-2010
.
Critical Thinking - snowblind - 03-15-2010
What do you mean SD? In terms that everyone can understand please.
Critical Thinking - Summer Dawne - 03-16-2010
.
Critical Thinking - snowblind - 03-16-2010
I am not aware of such research, are you saying that you are against research and critical thinking? Are you against scientific research that appears to be frivolous, or just science in general? I think it is important to have a rational discourse about issues that are impacting us right now. Nothing can be accomplished if we hold ourselves in an Ivory Tower not willing to get into the fray, and if we cannot grasp the verbiage of the people with the money to study these phenomena...then the phenomena will not be studied rigorously or seriously.
Critical Thinking - snowblind - 03-19-2010
This critical thinking is akin to autolysis. Looking at beliefs and tearing them apart till the only thing that remains is YOUR truth. Not mine, not Carlos', Buddha's, or ___________ insert deity/Guru/Nagual here. This is a powerful tool that will not only allow you to uncover the lies about self, but peer behind the curtain of self.
Critical Thinking - Mornings Son - 03-19-2010
Critical thinking involves determining the meaning and
significance of what is observed or expressed, or, concerning a given
inference or argument, determining whether there is adequate
justification to accept the conclusion as true. Hence, Fisher & Scriven define critical thinking as "Skilled, active,
interpretation and evaluation of observations, communications,
information, and argumentation."[1]
Moore & Parker define it more naturally as the careful, deliberate
determination of whether one should accept, reject, or suspend judgment
about a claim and the degree of confidence with which
one accepts or rejects it.[2]
Critical thinking gives due consideration to the evidence,
the context of judgment, the relevant criteria for making the
judgment well, the applicable methods or techniques for forming the
judgment, and the applicable theoretical constructs for understanding
the problem and the question at hand. Critical thinking employs not only
logic
but broad intellectual
criteria such as clarity, credibility,
accuracy, precision, relevance,
depth, breadth, significance and fairness.
In contemporary usage "critical" has the connotation of expressing
disapproval,[3]
which is not always true of critical thinking. A critical evaluation of
an argument, for example, might conclude that it is valid.
*****
HOW TO DO:
There is no simple way to develop the intellectual traits of a
critical thinker. One important way requires developing one's
intellectual empathy and intellectual humility. The first requires
extensive experience in entering and accurately constructing points of
view toward which one has negative feelings. The second requires
extensive experience in identifying the extent of one's own ignorance
in a wide variety of subjects (ignorance whose admission leads one to
say, "I thought I knew, but I merely believed"). One
becomes less biased and more broad-minded when one becomes more
intellectually empathic and intellectually humble, and that involves
time, deliberate practice and commitment. It involves considerable
personal and intellectual development.
To develop one's critical thinking traits, one should learn the art
of suspending judgment (for example, when reading a novel,
watching a movie, engaging in dialogical or dialectical
reasoning). Ways of doing this include adopting a perceptive rather than
judgmental orientation; that is, avoiding moving from perception to
judgment as one applies critical thinking to an issue.
One should become aware of one's own fallibility by:
accepting that everyone has subconscious
biases, and accordingly questioning any reflexive judgments;adopting an ego-sensitive and, indeed, intellectually humble
stance;recalling previous beliefs that one once held strongly but now
rejects;tendency towards group think; the amount your belief system is
formed by what those around you say instead of what you have personally
witnessed;realizing one still has numerous blind
spots, despite the foregoing.
An integration of insights from the critical thinking literature and
cognitive psychology literature is the "Method of Argument and Heuristic
Analysis." This technique illustrates the influences of heuristics and
biases on human decision making along with the influences of thinking
critically about reasons and claims.
******************************
It can be used as a stalking metode
Critical Thinking - snowblind - 03-19-2010
EXACTLY! Thank you for putting it so succinctly!
Critical Thinking - Mornings Son - 04-02-2010
fro wiki: (our old friend)
Theravada (buddhism) promotes the concept of Vibhajjavada (Pali), literally "Teaching of Analysis." This doctrine says that insight must come from the aspirant's experience, critical investigation, and reasoning instead of by blind faith; however, the scriptures of the Theravadan tradition also emphasize heeding the advice of the wise, considering such advice and evaluation of one's own experiences to be the two tests by which practices should be judged.
Critical Thinking - Mornings Son - 04-02-2010
In a way I find this in the line of Critical thinking, but with the adding of elder experienced brothers and sisters contribution
Critical Thinking - Guest - 08-21-2019