04-19-2016, 12:00 AM
billy, as stated in our sock puppet policy "If there is a reason why you might be falsely identified as a sock puppet it is on you to inform us of this." And not just inform us after posting (and after we start wondering who you are) but before. And not just in any random thread, what do you think that I go through all the posts you have ever written just in the chance that somewhere in that bulk of message text is a little footnote to the mods about a possible false sock puppet identification? I mean, REALLY?
Plus it is find dharma girl who should read our rules before she posts, if you are not competent enough to inform her of them even though you have been around for a while.
I am sorry to have banned you find dharma girl, cause I know it is possibly not a nice feeling to get banned. However, the fact that it happened and that you were identified as a sock is on the both of you and billy. As such your banning was reasonably justified.
Find dharma girl broke the rules by not informing us when she started posting. Members should inform themselves of our rules and proper protocols. Find dharma girl had quite enough time to do that too, she was around for quite a while, she wrote her first post on 22nd February, billy made his (for me invisible) note on 15th March and I banned her on 1st of April. Time enough to actually check in on our rules and write to site mods and management, in the appropriate thread and way, and also to do the writing herself. We have had married couples here before, each posting under their own account, and they have informed me right away that this is the case so that they are not identified as socks.
billy and find dharma girl have been basically wasting my time, energy, and effort. I find that inattentive to me and rude.
I also do not understand why I was not informed after banning find dharma girl that she was not a sock puppet. Any reasonable person would have done that within a week. I wonder if billy's wife is not just a front for billy's sock puppet. Plus, for all we know his wife is imaginary
Since you say there is no need to respond, I take it that find dharma girl has no wish to be unbanned (especially since I did not receive any such info from her).
Plus it is find dharma girl who should read our rules before she posts, if you are not competent enough to inform her of them even though you have been around for a while.
I am sorry to have banned you find dharma girl, cause I know it is possibly not a nice feeling to get banned. However, the fact that it happened and that you were identified as a sock is on the both of you and billy. As such your banning was reasonably justified.
Find dharma girl broke the rules by not informing us when she started posting. Members should inform themselves of our rules and proper protocols. Find dharma girl had quite enough time to do that too, she was around for quite a while, she wrote her first post on 22nd February, billy made his (for me invisible) note on 15th March and I banned her on 1st of April. Time enough to actually check in on our rules and write to site mods and management, in the appropriate thread and way, and also to do the writing herself. We have had married couples here before, each posting under their own account, and they have informed me right away that this is the case so that they are not identified as socks.
billy and find dharma girl have been basically wasting my time, energy, and effort. I find that inattentive to me and rude.
I also do not understand why I was not informed after banning find dharma girl that she was not a sock puppet. Any reasonable person would have done that within a week. I wonder if billy's wife is not just a front for billy's sock puppet. Plus, for all we know his wife is imaginary
Since you say there is no need to respond, I take it that find dharma girl has no wish to be unbanned (especially since I did not receive any such info from her).