06-29-2017, 12:00 AM
Yes, the site has already been discussing socks for a long while now. However, what I'm pointing out is that your application of rules is silly. The new information I offer is that while you have a rule against socks, you don't enforce it. You have your own sock. You've been aware I've had a plethora of socks and did nothing. Billy has socks, you do nothing. JJ has socks. Sen. SW. We all have them (for legit reasons. Socks are useful and productive at expressing various selves and functions). You made rules about no harassment of other members and infrequently enforce those rules. The point I make is--why bother having rules you can't abide by? My new suggestion is to toss the rules and do as Wolfie did: just say *** it and mod when it pleases you. That way, you're not misleading patrons by having rules you've barely followed or enforced.
My point is--why do you feel like you need to have rules? You can govern in any fashion you want. Wolf didn't have rules. If you see something questionable, you can just address it. Rules are an okay starting point, I guess, but if you're breaking your own rules or ignoring others breaking rules then rules become a burden to your quality of life. Either follow your own rules or get rid of them. Or I guess you can continue being a hypocrite. I think you could do better than that though.
My point is--why do you feel like you need to have rules? You can govern in any fashion you want. Wolf didn't have rules. If you see something questionable, you can just address it. Rules are an okay starting point, I guess, but if you're breaking your own rules or ignoring others breaking rules then rules become a burden to your quality of life. Either follow your own rules or get rid of them. Or I guess you can continue being a hypocrite. I think you could do better than that though.