10-01-2017, 12:00 AM
Le_Regard wrote:
rosygyro wrote:
You just gotta understand that underpinning the world IS the masculine known.
There are plenty of females who perpetuate the masculine known, plenty of males also.
The issues with the human habitual assemblage point are the reason our civilisation is tearing itself apart.
No, I don't. Calling it "the male known" is exactly what people are complaining about when they complain about "the patriarchy".
YOU need to understand that other assemblage points exist in your world, you shift them as much as they shift you, and a system of more or less consistent rules for communicating and getting along are what we call a "civilization".
If i were to call it the female known and the male unknown it would mean a different thing and would not be as relative
to the collective habitual position.
i am not that interested in personal assemblages as they run at tangents to the collective need.
calling it the female unknown lends itself more to sexually respecting the female as an "unknown"
and calling it the male known lends itself to self evaluation, or a much easier tackling of one polarity of the sexual as
the material tonal.
we can drag it back to the basic phallic symbol as the male known
and just appreciate that millions of phallic symbols have been created over the millions of years
and that if these phallus had done the job they were supposed to
that our world would have no issues regarding sexuality and time.
the male known or the phallus can exist as a physical object
wheras the female unknown is wholly positioned in the female.
we can tackle a stone, wood or ice or even symbolic phallus without it being a direct
attempt to effect an individual or indeed any organic part of man.
the same cannot be said of the unknown
and forebearance as such exists.
rosygyro wrote:
You just gotta understand that underpinning the world IS the masculine known.
There are plenty of females who perpetuate the masculine known, plenty of males also.
The issues with the human habitual assemblage point are the reason our civilisation is tearing itself apart.
No, I don't. Calling it "the male known" is exactly what people are complaining about when they complain about "the patriarchy".
YOU need to understand that other assemblage points exist in your world, you shift them as much as they shift you, and a system of more or less consistent rules for communicating and getting along are what we call a "civilization".
If i were to call it the female known and the male unknown it would mean a different thing and would not be as relative
to the collective habitual position.
i am not that interested in personal assemblages as they run at tangents to the collective need.
calling it the female unknown lends itself more to sexually respecting the female as an "unknown"
and calling it the male known lends itself to self evaluation, or a much easier tackling of one polarity of the sexual as
the material tonal.
we can drag it back to the basic phallic symbol as the male known
and just appreciate that millions of phallic symbols have been created over the millions of years
and that if these phallus had done the job they were supposed to
that our world would have no issues regarding sexuality and time.
the male known or the phallus can exist as a physical object
wheras the female unknown is wholly positioned in the female.
we can tackle a stone, wood or ice or even symbolic phallus without it being a direct
attempt to effect an individual or indeed any organic part of man.
the same cannot be said of the unknown
and forebearance as such exists.