10-04-2017, 12:00 AM
rosygyro wrote:Julio Juliopolis wrote:
rosygyro wrote:
When I talk about the male known I am using existential
Form as an analogy.
I am aware sexism exists and I stand against its perpetuation.
Well, that is exactly the point I've been contending in here. I don't think you are standing against sexism, but rather perpetuating it with your "male known", "female unknown" and general attitudes expressed here.
In order to stand against its current trends it is necessary to talk about basic forms of root physicality.
Much like you would talk about the factory from which a junkyard car once rolled out.
I don't know why you think sexism is rooted in the physical. It's roots are emotional. To examine it's roots, we ought to look for emotional manipulations so powerful they can get most men to refuse to accept a lifeboat for themselves if their ship is sinking, in favor of giving it to someone else on the sole basis of their sex, just to confirm to themselves that they are good people. Women of course are manipulated to feel entitled to the lifeboat just because they're women. Who emotionally manipulates and brainwashes the masses at large? How do they do it? These are the sorts of questions that should be looked into.
Ok..
Please explain your stance using the following terms.
Objective
Subjective
Corporeal
Matter
Energy
Space
Time
Sorcerers world
Known
Unknown
Inherent awareness
Evolving awareness
North
East
South
West.
Please omit male or female.
I will then use the same cardinal pinpoints to explain my own stanceMy stance is an educational one. People who believe they stand against something should be informed when their actions actually perpetuate rather than oppose that thing. Also, I agree with the idea of equality expressed by Don juan in the CC books. A person shouldn't look up to, nor down on anyone. They should understand we all have equal value. Finally, when I see someone say that they had to run away from the sight of a girl for 20 minutes before allowing themselves to like her, along with some of the other things you've writ here, it tells me they probably need to recap some of the things they learned about their sexuality.
Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
rosygyro wrote:
When I talk about the male known I am using existential
Form as an analogy.
I am aware sexism exists and I stand against its perpetuation.
Well, that is exactly the point I've been contending in here. I don't think you are standing against sexism, but rather perpetuating it with your "male known", "female unknown" and general attitudes expressed here.
In order to stand against its current trends it is necessary to talk about basic forms of root physicality.
Much like you would talk about the factory from which a junkyard car once rolled out.
I don't know why you think sexism is rooted in the physical. It's roots are emotional. To examine it's roots, we ought to look for emotional manipulations so powerful they can get most men to refuse to accept a lifeboat for themselves if their ship is sinking, in favor of giving it to someone else on the sole basis of their sex, just to confirm to themselves that they are good people. Women of course are manipulated to feel entitled to the lifeboat just because they're women. Who emotionally manipulates and brainwashes the masses at large? How do they do it? These are the sorts of questions that should be looked into.
Ok..
Please explain your stance using the following terms.
Objective
Subjective
Corporeal
Matter
Energy
Space
Time
Sorcerers world
Known
Unknown
Inherent awareness
Evolving awareness
North
East
South
West.
Please omit male or female.
I will then use the same cardinal pinpoints to explain my own stanceMy stance is an educational one. People who believe they stand against something should be informed when their actions actually perpetuate rather than oppose that thing. Also, I agree with the idea of equality expressed by Don juan in the CC books. A person shouldn't look up to, nor down on anyone. They should understand we all have equal value. Finally, when I see someone say that they had to run away from the sight of a girl for 20 minutes before allowing themselves to like her, along with some of the other things you've writ here, it tells me they probably need to recap some of the things they learned about their sexuality.
Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk