Sexual celibacy and the absolute withholding of the sexual chi as an enlightening practice.

[Le_Regard]

rosygyro wrote:
MOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmoth

So here's my conclusion.  Just because person X is NOT CELIBATE, that doesn't mean person X wants to *** Person Y.  Person Y can die alone and insane, it's not Person X's problem.

So logically, Person X can easily be NOT CELIBATE in general, but also CELIBATE concerning Person Y in particular.  So a person can be simultaneously CELIBATE and NOT CELIBATE.

Or, alternatively, the Universe doesn't support INDIVIDUALS like that and we're all energetically connected and everything is fucking everything all the time and there is no SELF to be a GOOD SELF or an EVIL SELF or a CELIBATE or a NOT CELIBATE SELF.

But I do feel rather strongly that I exist, other people exist, and that sometimes people hit on other people, and being told "no" seems radically more typical than saying "yes" in most cases.

Maybe it's different for the unbelievably beautiful or the unbelievably rich... but I wouldn't know anything about that.