10-09-2017, 12:00 AM
Le_Regard wrote:
rosygyro wrote:
MOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmoth
So logically, Person X can easily be NOT CELIBATE in general, but also CELIBATE concerning Person Y in particular. So a person can be simultaneously CELIBATE and NOT CELIBATE.
You makes your choices according to desire or values inferior, values superior.
You makes your choices according to THEGREATWORK or according to your socially complex egoic sense of personal rights.
Not celibate in general! Hmmmm
rosygyro wrote:
MOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmoth
So logically, Person X can easily be NOT CELIBATE in general, but also CELIBATE concerning Person Y in particular. So a person can be simultaneously CELIBATE and NOT CELIBATE.
You makes your choices according to desire or values inferior, values superior.
You makes your choices according to THEGREATWORK or according to your socially complex egoic sense of personal rights.
Not celibate in general! Hmmmm

