10-09-2017, 12:00 AM
rosygyro wrote:
Le_Regard wrote:
rosygyro wrote:
MOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmoth
So logically, Person X can easily be NOT CELIBATE in general, but also CELIBATE concerning Person Y in particular. So a person can be simultaneously CELIBATE and NOT CELIBATE.
You makes your choices according to desire or values inferior, values superior.
You makes your choices according to THEGREATWORK or according to your socially complex egoic sense of personal rights.
Not celibate in general! Hmmmm
think it's strange you haven't noticed, but at this time in history which values are the inferior ones and which values are the superior ones is a subject of much debate, and perhaps even a bit of a racially charged question.
Le_Regard wrote:
rosygyro wrote:
MOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmothMOTHmoth
So logically, Person X can easily be NOT CELIBATE in general, but also CELIBATE concerning Person Y in particular. So a person can be simultaneously CELIBATE and NOT CELIBATE.
You makes your choices according to desire or values inferior, values superior.
You makes your choices according to THEGREATWORK or according to your socially complex egoic sense of personal rights.
Not celibate in general! Hmmmm
think it's strange you haven't noticed, but at this time in history which values are the inferior ones and which values are the superior ones is a subject of much debate, and perhaps even a bit of a racially charged question.