10-15-2017, 12:01 AM
rosygyro wrote:
Julio Juliopolis wrote:
rosygyro wrote:
there was once a coven of 13, all previously abused they sought to change the male.
They formed a circle and bid the rapist, the pedophile and the bully enter.
No such man dared step up.
So I did- foolishly believing that no curse against such men could touch me and I could cross unscathed.
Took a while.
Would you like to hear a true story? There once was a man who bragged to me about being invited to attend a women's only group to speak one time because his energy was so pure and he was so aligned with the feminine, (which he obviously believed to be "better" and just naturally expected me to do so without question as well). He was so proud of being considered almost as good as a, (any!), woman.
Want to hear another one? There once was a ship called the Titanic which sunk, in which men refused to use lifeboats and kept them out of the hands of other men so that they would only go to women, whom they valued more than themselves out of respect for them having accomplished being born with a different body type.
How about a 3rd? I keep telling you you aren't inferior and you keep arguing with me. My guess is to convince someone else that you're good and worthy of love, you've got to believe yours is the inferior kind, but only recap will tell you for sure why you do that.
that makes no sense.
Really? The whole thing? You can make no sense of any of it? Or is it just the last part you don't get? I'm guessing the last part, because I did incorporate a lot into that last sentence. Perhaps it would be clearer if I broke that down...
1 - I keep telling you that you are NOT inferior and you keep arguing with me.
2- Thus far, you have not shown any evidence that you reached this view as a result of deductive reasoning.
3 - Earlier, you admitted that this view didn't come from seeing either but rather you feel a need to show greater respect for one birth group than another.
4 - In order to see where you've gotten this view for sure you'd have to recap it.
5 - My guess is that the view was needed to please other people.
Does that make it more clear for you?
In my case, I can'd understand the following...
"there exists through a study of MEST. recap, intent a way to SHIFT the assemblage point."
First, I don't know what MEST means. Second, the sentence structure is all wrong. What is the word intent doing in there? My best attempt to translate that into something I can understand is to read it like "There exists, (through a study of MEST recap), a way to shift the assemblage point." Do you follow this up by saying what this study was about? Do you distinguish between this way of shifting the assemblage point and other ways? In each case the answer is no. So how am I supposed to know what you're saying?
unlike a movement of the assemblage point which can happen through will or intent
a shift of the assemblage point can only happen through intent and totality.
This creates more of the same kind of confusion for me as to what you mean. Why isn't unlike capitalized? You used a period after the previous word but didn't capitalize this one. Is this the start of a new sentence or not? I'm guessing it is, but why make your reader guess? Why not follow the universal capitalization rules and be clear to everyone? So to once again punctuate your sentence in the way that makes it closest to making sense to me... "Unlike a movement of the assemblage point, (which can happen through will or intent), a shift of the assemblage point can only happen through intent and totality." This still doesn't make a lot of sense though, because the word totality is ambiguous. Totality of what? And how does something happen "through totality"?
consider a sorcerer who doesnt like the vibe in a room he is in
he could choose to manipulate his assembage point through will to any position he desires
Okay.
wheras to shift his assemblage point would be immpossible
if it contained elements of social conditioning or personal history he needed to resolve.
I'm not sure I agree there. Why would a shift be impossible? How exactly does a shift contain elements of personal history or social conditioning?
a movement of the assemblage point is a snap decision and a shift is indicitive of the lifelong decision.
THE lifelong decision? You are not explaining yourself.
a shift of the assemblage point will change perception whilst the personal history and evidence of a persons life will no matter how hidden remain unchanged.
a shift of the assemblage point will move the entire MEST bolus
i.e. the sorcerers world.
and with it will stir the elelements of the cocoon in which recapitulation and personal histiry and social conditioning reside.
Still no idea what your trying to say at all. I'm honestly unsure if you're not just playing a game of word soup.
a shift of the assemblage point is connected to the north east , south and west.
a movement is usually just a withdrawel from the east and an overempowerment of west.
these wild stabs in the dark at my sexual adequacy are unecissary and also unwarrented
Has anyone questioned your sexual adequacy? Have I implied anything in any way about your prowess in that matter at all? Seriously, where in this conversation do you believe we've been discussing that?
You've become defensive here. It's your view I've been "attacking", not you. When a person becomes defensive when their view alone is being assaulted, it's a red flag that their view exists to serve an emotional purpose.
as i have not tried at all to identify your own petty shortcomings
No, but you do include me in the inferior group when you praise women as superior. Even so, I've replied nicely.
what do you think this is?
A variety show called "Life", episode 14,755.
who are these give a **** audience who care about your attitude
Don't know. I don't think about my audience too often. I tend to focus on the characters on stage with me.
and applaud your attempts to drag others down to a level of your own equality?
Ah yes. Since your view is the morally correct one and I'm stubbornly opposing it I must be the villain in this drama, eh? Do you picture me twirling my mustache and saying "I'll drag those womenz down to the level of only being equal to me" while cackling evilly?
Well, sorry to disappoint, but this episode is going another route. See, I believe in the idea that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Take anything in the universe, anything at all, and look at it with a certain perspective and it is exquisite. Everything can be seen as marvelous, beautiful, and worthy of reverence. Likewise, anything can be seen as filthy, disgusting, and fit to be destroyed. Since this is only a matter of your chosen point of view, all things are actually equal. Go ahead and look at the world with reverence. See the divine in a squirrel, a passing cloud, a rock, and a raspberry pie. Then, if you hear a blueberry pie tell another blueberry pie how superior the raspberry pies are don't condemn the latter for "attempting to drag the raspberry pie down to it's level" when it replies to the first with, "No, we're just as divine as the raspberry ones no matter what your mommy, daddy, beloved aunt, and 3rd grade teacher Miss Sweety said to you while you were growing up. You ought to recap all that so you can be free to see your own divinity without guilt."
Julio Juliopolis wrote:
rosygyro wrote:
there was once a coven of 13, all previously abused they sought to change the male.
They formed a circle and bid the rapist, the pedophile and the bully enter.
No such man dared step up.
So I did- foolishly believing that no curse against such men could touch me and I could cross unscathed.
Took a while.
Would you like to hear a true story? There once was a man who bragged to me about being invited to attend a women's only group to speak one time because his energy was so pure and he was so aligned with the feminine, (which he obviously believed to be "better" and just naturally expected me to do so without question as well). He was so proud of being considered almost as good as a, (any!), woman.
Want to hear another one? There once was a ship called the Titanic which sunk, in which men refused to use lifeboats and kept them out of the hands of other men so that they would only go to women, whom they valued more than themselves out of respect for them having accomplished being born with a different body type.
How about a 3rd? I keep telling you you aren't inferior and you keep arguing with me. My guess is to convince someone else that you're good and worthy of love, you've got to believe yours is the inferior kind, but only recap will tell you for sure why you do that.
that makes no sense.
Really? The whole thing? You can make no sense of any of it? Or is it just the last part you don't get? I'm guessing the last part, because I did incorporate a lot into that last sentence. Perhaps it would be clearer if I broke that down...
1 - I keep telling you that you are NOT inferior and you keep arguing with me.
2- Thus far, you have not shown any evidence that you reached this view as a result of deductive reasoning.
3 - Earlier, you admitted that this view didn't come from seeing either but rather you feel a need to show greater respect for one birth group than another.
4 - In order to see where you've gotten this view for sure you'd have to recap it.
5 - My guess is that the view was needed to please other people.
Does that make it more clear for you?
In my case, I can'd understand the following...
"there exists through a study of MEST. recap, intent a way to SHIFT the assemblage point."
First, I don't know what MEST means. Second, the sentence structure is all wrong. What is the word intent doing in there? My best attempt to translate that into something I can understand is to read it like "There exists, (through a study of MEST recap), a way to shift the assemblage point." Do you follow this up by saying what this study was about? Do you distinguish between this way of shifting the assemblage point and other ways? In each case the answer is no. So how am I supposed to know what you're saying?
unlike a movement of the assemblage point which can happen through will or intent
a shift of the assemblage point can only happen through intent and totality.
This creates more of the same kind of confusion for me as to what you mean. Why isn't unlike capitalized? You used a period after the previous word but didn't capitalize this one. Is this the start of a new sentence or not? I'm guessing it is, but why make your reader guess? Why not follow the universal capitalization rules and be clear to everyone? So to once again punctuate your sentence in the way that makes it closest to making sense to me... "Unlike a movement of the assemblage point, (which can happen through will or intent), a shift of the assemblage point can only happen through intent and totality." This still doesn't make a lot of sense though, because the word totality is ambiguous. Totality of what? And how does something happen "through totality"?
consider a sorcerer who doesnt like the vibe in a room he is in
he could choose to manipulate his assembage point through will to any position he desires
Okay.
wheras to shift his assemblage point would be immpossible
if it contained elements of social conditioning or personal history he needed to resolve.
I'm not sure I agree there. Why would a shift be impossible? How exactly does a shift contain elements of personal history or social conditioning?
a movement of the assemblage point is a snap decision and a shift is indicitive of the lifelong decision.
THE lifelong decision? You are not explaining yourself.
a shift of the assemblage point will change perception whilst the personal history and evidence of a persons life will no matter how hidden remain unchanged.
a shift of the assemblage point will move the entire MEST bolus
i.e. the sorcerers world.
and with it will stir the elelements of the cocoon in which recapitulation and personal histiry and social conditioning reside.
Still no idea what your trying to say at all. I'm honestly unsure if you're not just playing a game of word soup.
a shift of the assemblage point is connected to the north east , south and west.
a movement is usually just a withdrawel from the east and an overempowerment of west.
these wild stabs in the dark at my sexual adequacy are unecissary and also unwarrented
Has anyone questioned your sexual adequacy? Have I implied anything in any way about your prowess in that matter at all? Seriously, where in this conversation do you believe we've been discussing that?
You've become defensive here. It's your view I've been "attacking", not you. When a person becomes defensive when their view alone is being assaulted, it's a red flag that their view exists to serve an emotional purpose.
as i have not tried at all to identify your own petty shortcomings
No, but you do include me in the inferior group when you praise women as superior. Even so, I've replied nicely.
what do you think this is?
A variety show called "Life", episode 14,755.
who are these give a **** audience who care about your attitude
Don't know. I don't think about my audience too often. I tend to focus on the characters on stage with me.
and applaud your attempts to drag others down to a level of your own equality?
Ah yes. Since your view is the morally correct one and I'm stubbornly opposing it I must be the villain in this drama, eh? Do you picture me twirling my mustache and saying "I'll drag those womenz down to the level of only being equal to me" while cackling evilly?
Well, sorry to disappoint, but this episode is going another route. See, I believe in the idea that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Take anything in the universe, anything at all, and look at it with a certain perspective and it is exquisite. Everything can be seen as marvelous, beautiful, and worthy of reverence. Likewise, anything can be seen as filthy, disgusting, and fit to be destroyed. Since this is only a matter of your chosen point of view, all things are actually equal. Go ahead and look at the world with reverence. See the divine in a squirrel, a passing cloud, a rock, and a raspberry pie. Then, if you hear a blueberry pie tell another blueberry pie how superior the raspberry pies are don't condemn the latter for "attempting to drag the raspberry pie down to it's level" when it replies to the first with, "No, we're just as divine as the raspberry ones no matter what your mommy, daddy, beloved aunt, and 3rd grade teacher Miss Sweety said to you while you were growing up. You ought to recap all that so you can be free to see your own divinity without guilt."