11-16-2017, 12:02 AM
What's wrong with questioning what's gone before? DJ certainly did. The point of his questioning lying in the motive behind burying what is clear and simple, in terms of anyone's capacity to return to power, behind mountains of metaphor to the extent that the crux of the matter gets utterly lost. Toltec wisdom held by Toltec masters. Certainly not content-less. But certainly possibly ego-driven, masters though they may have been. Diverting the source of power and caging it in complex systems which seek to hide and hoard...in order to dominate. It's was kind of his whole point behind attempting to forge a new direction for the "new seers"....or "modern seers"....or whatever. In order to save the lineage from its previous trajectory of dark ego-obsession.
I don't see that you 're driven by ego. I see you trying to incite a change to a direction that is more wholesome for anyone attempting to reconnect through their own connecting link with intent. That's why I don't understand the sheer complexity of your presentation. From my limited perspective, it diverts attention into a maze which implies importance about core elements that might help engender that change, but the import gets lost in all the swirling/shifting/changing twists and turns. Maybe you're trying to ensnare that aspect of attention that's actually a liability to seeing things clearly, leaving the reader with only one recourse....to go simply within a find that link and attempt to clear it on their own.
That's kind of what I'm left with, so I'll simply extract myself and get on with it before I'm inextricably enmeshed in what's clearly over my head. The stage is all yours.
Capice
I don't see that you 're driven by ego. I see you trying to incite a change to a direction that is more wholesome for anyone attempting to reconnect through their own connecting link with intent. That's why I don't understand the sheer complexity of your presentation. From my limited perspective, it diverts attention into a maze which implies importance about core elements that might help engender that change, but the import gets lost in all the swirling/shifting/changing twists and turns. Maybe you're trying to ensnare that aspect of attention that's actually a liability to seeing things clearly, leaving the reader with only one recourse....to go simply within a find that link and attempt to clear it on their own.
That's kind of what I'm left with, so I'll simply extract myself and get on with it before I'm inextricably enmeshed in what's clearly over my head. The stage is all yours.
Capice