11-16-2017, 12:02 AM
"Will is what you want to happen
Intent is what actually happens"
Yes, rosygyro/exactly/smile... but I reiterate, the two are hardly related.
On intent's path there is no use whatsoever for will. Why would one use will when SEEING clearly, KNOWING unambiguously? Intent is the perfect unfolding of fabric. One would have to be stubborn, wilful and ignorant to cross intent.
A response to Julio (and serloco):
First of all, 'unbending intent' is redundant. Intent is unbending.
Julio, belief, imagination, energetic emotion, and specific aim are integral elements of will, but not intent.
1) Belief is not part of intent whatsoever. Intent is SEEING. One KNOWS the vision.
2) Imagination has nothing to do with intent either. An idea pops out as a seedling from the unconscious ground of being. One SEES it. Early on (without input), one is privy to the vision revealing both its foundational roots and foreseeable fruition.
There are obvious tells common to intent---> synchronicity, connective auspicious thrums, sensation of guidance, equanimity, evenness, and confidence. There is immediate and unequivocal overrule of momentary doubts, a recurrent, reinforcing, auspicious 'key,' a spaciousness for 'watching,' and a crescendo. (There are other traits, but all experiences of intent include the elements mentioned).
3) Energetic emotion is not germane to intent. Intent is autonomous, such that ordinary conditioning becomes moot. In fact, one witnesses, mirrors, and mimics intent. Intent is steady and sure, and the one increasingly acquires the same demeanor as the intent. Intent is never rash, heavy, or given to emotional swings.
While intent extraordinarily lifts (and one can be excited), the intent itself retains qualities that are matter of fact. Intent is always conducive to objectivity and reason come examination. Instead of energetic emotion, think of a pervasive fluid movement with certainty. This is not to say there isn't bumpiness altogether, just not in approximation to the intent.
4) Specific aim is not the property of intent. True, the person with intent recognizes a matured outcome of an idea is forthcoming, but the essential nature of spiritual/sorceric view concerning intent is that it has no limitations. While there are descriptions, none limits the heights. Besides, the awesome manifestation of intent always supersedes whatever was perceived.
what are you?
The secret to dynamic separation is to be instantaneous to the opportunity. If experiences get hold of you first, you will lack energy commensurate to flipping those situations. Emanation's energy must be tapped in full on arrival.
Later, you will discover that in detachment art form, manifestation is second to initial emanations. The reason I can now head off any existential weightiness, is because I mark off 'troubling' emanation(s) with conscious pause as it arrives. I am ahead of time.
For example: if the dregs of angst suddenly visit with CLOUT, it is not foreign to me. It is at once my angst and my clout. I am very POSSESSIVE.
The attributes are perceptually negative, and the formidable angst is distinctly there before me.. LIKE WHAM!! Nevertheless, beyond the initial emanation, its moment of arrival is my moment.
That is I have already positioned myself as an observer simply by seizing that position (point of unconcern).
Imagine holding a very negative emotion as an object in hand, and SEEING that object as it is. Now, pretend you could play with the object as if it were a stuffed huggy bear. THAT
The novitiate in detachment muddles through opportunities, and the practice yields minor energetic gain. Later, one recognizes what needs attention in this art form---> the SELF mastery of awareness.
I cannot emphasize enough, that in earlier development of the detachment art from, most need heavy duty tonal/occupational structure. Exercising of objectivity belongs there, and no dichotomy between tonal and spiritual activity exists. You pursue accessible conventional avenues, with optimum focus, standard achievement measurements, and tonal goals. The simple caveat is that you choose spiritual growth as the permeating focus.. not the material gains (though they are both to be tonally and spiritually appreciated).
In effect, you lead with the body. One's vision is habitually the chosen driver. Each move of your body in tonal occupation is a reinforcing awareness of the spiritual intent. You choose this pathway of objectivity until it is habitual.
The occupation will not consume you, so long as you are mindful of sorcery and controlled folly and spirit. And it should be mentioned, that success in a compartmentalized structure of a specific occupation is not success whatsoever if its disciplines are not carried into broader tonal balance and tonal/spiritual integrity. You are not changing your self; you are becoming wholesome.
Jiddu Krishnamurti: "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society."
I have this dream where an Asian master instructs me on delivering the highest orgasmic pleasure. The dream is unusual, as I am told in immediacy to sucking another man's cock. There is no further manifestation of such act in the dream, though it seems I was to resume. It is the 1st time in dreaming for this Still, I've indulged cuckold fantasy for sure.
[As you discern by my wanting/needing to explain, I'm a bit homophobic/lol].
The master began by naming the technique (I could not grasp the name). It pertained to taking charge of edging by ruling the other's breath. This involved utilizing my own awareness without verbalization (though, my interpretation would be that there would be no restriction on words).
Once I am locked in, HOW the man or woman is breathing is irrelevant. It does not matter if the other's breaths are full and oxygen providing, or stilted to the point of restricting air. It does not matter if the person is relaxed or strained. It is immaterial if I am, or am not, responsible for any specific change or aspect of respiration.
The whole of the technique is transmission of awareness to the other that I now them.. their breath, mind, and body.
My focus is met with reciprocating anticipation. There is increasing intensity here (from start to finish), that accompanies an unspoken plea in desperation. I will see it in their eyes and facial expression. As the other surrenders will, I am empowered.
The stakes get higher.
The sexual edging is merely the form. An orgasm is no longer the person's focus, because this person is reduced to erotic neediness enveloped by hysteria. Anguished autonomy has given way to begging dependency.. and so, acute perceptual craving is responsive to the sharpened edge of my sword, my power, my own desire.
The person's craving is now blind, unconditional, and reflexive.
I have taken them to the primal void. Several minutes here is an awesome eternity. This person will meet an abstrusity of exquisite primordial stimuli. Yet, the concurrent angst of this abyss is unbearable sufferance without conscience. So the entity must bottom out (be released).
Then, there is a phenomenal bath in ecstatic closure, followed by the euphoria of purified SELF awareness.
While being projections, these are not just descriptions.. I know this place empirically. I know of it subjectively, objectively, and corporeally. Taking charge of edging by ruling the other's breath, is just one procedure in domination. All Top/bottom methodology is objective and accessible to me.
(glance left says) "You previously implied that the new position of assemblage is a coming inevitability. It seems that the only way to prepare is to simply acquiesce to the moment at hand and align with whatever force is carrying us to the position of inevitability."
If something is 'inevitable' there is no reason to prepare for what is already set in stone. I would remind you to make a distinction between emanations and life's moments.
I acquiesce to emanations.
I choose the next moment(s) unfolding. I often acquiesce next, but I may choose to throw the emanations away or PLAY (recreate) with them.
I would have you reconsider about aligning with 'whatever' force.
Even in my intent, which is so deeply grounded as to be unconscious, I do not forget that intent is MY force. AND, in all other ways I see to it that is MY force carrying me [unless I choose to allow an alignment with seemingly 'whatever' force (as I did 1st with serloco, and 2nd with 'the' ____ )].
Sorcery is much more about objective decisiveness (if not SEEING) than mysticism.
Answer correctly, or I'll completely ignore you tonally. You'll end up like Emoto's 3rd container of rotting rice.
Djete says: maybe she needs to find you
I'm fed up with you.
Le_Regard- "I don't know. Why do I exist? I have no explanation at all except that it's happening, but if I'm quite honest I do actually feel an incredible sense of purpose, like I have IMPORTANT THINGS TO SAY before I die."
I will realize that futility is real {because it is} I CANNOT make it not futile/lol. The stickiness of repetitive meaninglessness is part of having to exist.
I enter the futility's angst deeply enough so as to arrive at indifference, but my clarity is only become sharper.
So is being then poisoned by futility. Well............ sure it is...... necessarily so.
In the conventional world, one goes to a spouse, the psychiatrist, a clergy person, the pharmacist etc. to cope.
And, most anyone will forward a version of meaning.
My honesty refuses remedy. I create meaning.
In developed detachment as the 'way', the entire span of emotions can be what they are; that is, there is no REAL 'insecurity' about ANY. In one sense, the mind is allowed to run wild, yet there is no fluctuation of being, no threat of dementia. One is held steady by awareness of simply being, waiting, allowing, and watching.
Occasionally, adherence or/and indulgence arises for self-action that is apart from the observer SELF ('normal' experience). It is what it is.. then reason finally executes detachment.. says, "next."
The way of detachment is akin to an algorithm, and reason is increasingly adept to identify self as image selves, and SELF as fluid SELF reigns authentic and true.. self-pities become flirtatious caresses that are exquisite expressions of emptiness. What is seen is seen; unseemly states drown in humble MEANINGLESSNESS.
I am in a super-duper way of being alive.
(Edit notes - I removed some comments to the mods that were pretty well irrelevant to the rest of the post. - Julio)
Intent is what actually happens"
Yes, rosygyro/exactly/smile... but I reiterate, the two are hardly related.
On intent's path there is no use whatsoever for will. Why would one use will when SEEING clearly, KNOWING unambiguously? Intent is the perfect unfolding of fabric. One would have to be stubborn, wilful and ignorant to cross intent.
A response to Julio (and serloco):
First of all, 'unbending intent' is redundant. Intent is unbending.
Julio, belief, imagination, energetic emotion, and specific aim are integral elements of will, but not intent.
1) Belief is not part of intent whatsoever. Intent is SEEING. One KNOWS the vision.
2) Imagination has nothing to do with intent either. An idea pops out as a seedling from the unconscious ground of being. One SEES it. Early on (without input), one is privy to the vision revealing both its foundational roots and foreseeable fruition.
There are obvious tells common to intent---> synchronicity, connective auspicious thrums, sensation of guidance, equanimity, evenness, and confidence. There is immediate and unequivocal overrule of momentary doubts, a recurrent, reinforcing, auspicious 'key,' a spaciousness for 'watching,' and a crescendo. (There are other traits, but all experiences of intent include the elements mentioned).
3) Energetic emotion is not germane to intent. Intent is autonomous, such that ordinary conditioning becomes moot. In fact, one witnesses, mirrors, and mimics intent. Intent is steady and sure, and the one increasingly acquires the same demeanor as the intent. Intent is never rash, heavy, or given to emotional swings.
While intent extraordinarily lifts (and one can be excited), the intent itself retains qualities that are matter of fact. Intent is always conducive to objectivity and reason come examination. Instead of energetic emotion, think of a pervasive fluid movement with certainty. This is not to say there isn't bumpiness altogether, just not in approximation to the intent.
4) Specific aim is not the property of intent. True, the person with intent recognizes a matured outcome of an idea is forthcoming, but the essential nature of spiritual/sorceric view concerning intent is that it has no limitations. While there are descriptions, none limits the heights. Besides, the awesome manifestation of intent always supersedes whatever was perceived.
what are you?
The secret to dynamic separation is to be instantaneous to the opportunity. If experiences get hold of you first, you will lack energy commensurate to flipping those situations. Emanation's energy must be tapped in full on arrival.
Later, you will discover that in detachment art form, manifestation is second to initial emanations. The reason I can now head off any existential weightiness, is because I mark off 'troubling' emanation(s) with conscious pause as it arrives. I am ahead of time.
For example: if the dregs of angst suddenly visit with CLOUT, it is not foreign to me. It is at once my angst and my clout. I am very POSSESSIVE.
The attributes are perceptually negative, and the formidable angst is distinctly there before me.. LIKE WHAM!! Nevertheless, beyond the initial emanation, its moment of arrival is my moment.
That is I have already positioned myself as an observer simply by seizing that position (point of unconcern).
Imagine holding a very negative emotion as an object in hand, and SEEING that object as it is. Now, pretend you could play with the object as if it were a stuffed huggy bear. THAT
The novitiate in detachment muddles through opportunities, and the practice yields minor energetic gain. Later, one recognizes what needs attention in this art form---> the SELF mastery of awareness.
I cannot emphasize enough, that in earlier development of the detachment art from, most need heavy duty tonal/occupational structure. Exercising of objectivity belongs there, and no dichotomy between tonal and spiritual activity exists. You pursue accessible conventional avenues, with optimum focus, standard achievement measurements, and tonal goals. The simple caveat is that you choose spiritual growth as the permeating focus.. not the material gains (though they are both to be tonally and spiritually appreciated).
In effect, you lead with the body. One's vision is habitually the chosen driver. Each move of your body in tonal occupation is a reinforcing awareness of the spiritual intent. You choose this pathway of objectivity until it is habitual.
The occupation will not consume you, so long as you are mindful of sorcery and controlled folly and spirit. And it should be mentioned, that success in a compartmentalized structure of a specific occupation is not success whatsoever if its disciplines are not carried into broader tonal balance and tonal/spiritual integrity. You are not changing your self; you are becoming wholesome.
Jiddu Krishnamurti: "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society."
I have this dream where an Asian master instructs me on delivering the highest orgasmic pleasure. The dream is unusual, as I am told in immediacy to sucking another man's cock. There is no further manifestation of such act in the dream, though it seems I was to resume. It is the 1st time in dreaming for this Still, I've indulged cuckold fantasy for sure.
[As you discern by my wanting/needing to explain, I'm a bit homophobic/lol].
The master began by naming the technique (I could not grasp the name). It pertained to taking charge of edging by ruling the other's breath. This involved utilizing my own awareness without verbalization (though, my interpretation would be that there would be no restriction on words).
Once I am locked in, HOW the man or woman is breathing is irrelevant. It does not matter if the other's breaths are full and oxygen providing, or stilted to the point of restricting air. It does not matter if the person is relaxed or strained. It is immaterial if I am, or am not, responsible for any specific change or aspect of respiration.
The whole of the technique is transmission of awareness to the other that I now them.. their breath, mind, and body.
My focus is met with reciprocating anticipation. There is increasing intensity here (from start to finish), that accompanies an unspoken plea in desperation. I will see it in their eyes and facial expression. As the other surrenders will, I am empowered.
The stakes get higher.
The sexual edging is merely the form. An orgasm is no longer the person's focus, because this person is reduced to erotic neediness enveloped by hysteria. Anguished autonomy has given way to begging dependency.. and so, acute perceptual craving is responsive to the sharpened edge of my sword, my power, my own desire.
The person's craving is now blind, unconditional, and reflexive.
I have taken them to the primal void. Several minutes here is an awesome eternity. This person will meet an abstrusity of exquisite primordial stimuli. Yet, the concurrent angst of this abyss is unbearable sufferance without conscience. So the entity must bottom out (be released).
Then, there is a phenomenal bath in ecstatic closure, followed by the euphoria of purified SELF awareness.
While being projections, these are not just descriptions.. I know this place empirically. I know of it subjectively, objectively, and corporeally. Taking charge of edging by ruling the other's breath, is just one procedure in domination. All Top/bottom methodology is objective and accessible to me.
(glance left says) "You previously implied that the new position of assemblage is a coming inevitability. It seems that the only way to prepare is to simply acquiesce to the moment at hand and align with whatever force is carrying us to the position of inevitability."
If something is 'inevitable' there is no reason to prepare for what is already set in stone. I would remind you to make a distinction between emanations and life's moments.
I acquiesce to emanations.
I choose the next moment(s) unfolding. I often acquiesce next, but I may choose to throw the emanations away or PLAY (recreate) with them.
I would have you reconsider about aligning with 'whatever' force.
Even in my intent, which is so deeply grounded as to be unconscious, I do not forget that intent is MY force. AND, in all other ways I see to it that is MY force carrying me [unless I choose to allow an alignment with seemingly 'whatever' force (as I did 1st with serloco, and 2nd with 'the' ____ )].
Sorcery is much more about objective decisiveness (if not SEEING) than mysticism.
Answer correctly, or I'll completely ignore you tonally. You'll end up like Emoto's 3rd container of rotting rice.
Djete says: maybe she needs to find you
I'm fed up with you.Le_Regard- "I don't know. Why do I exist? I have no explanation at all except that it's happening, but if I'm quite honest I do actually feel an incredible sense of purpose, like I have IMPORTANT THINGS TO SAY before I die."
I will realize that futility is real {because it is} I CANNOT make it not futile/lol. The stickiness of repetitive meaninglessness is part of having to exist.
I enter the futility's angst deeply enough so as to arrive at indifference, but my clarity is only become sharper.
So is being then poisoned by futility. Well............ sure it is...... necessarily so.
In the conventional world, one goes to a spouse, the psychiatrist, a clergy person, the pharmacist etc. to cope.
And, most anyone will forward a version of meaning.
My honesty refuses remedy. I create meaning.
In developed detachment as the 'way', the entire span of emotions can be what they are; that is, there is no REAL 'insecurity' about ANY. In one sense, the mind is allowed to run wild, yet there is no fluctuation of being, no threat of dementia. One is held steady by awareness of simply being, waiting, allowing, and watching.
Occasionally, adherence or/and indulgence arises for self-action that is apart from the observer SELF ('normal' experience). It is what it is.. then reason finally executes detachment.. says, "next."
The way of detachment is akin to an algorithm, and reason is increasingly adept to identify self as image selves, and SELF as fluid SELF reigns authentic and true.. self-pities become flirtatious caresses that are exquisite expressions of emptiness. What is seen is seen; unseemly states drown in humble MEANINGLESSNESS.
I am in a super-duper way of being alive.
(Edit notes - I removed some comments to the mods that were pretty well irrelevant to the rest of the post. - Julio)