11-20-2017, 12:02 AM
Le_Regard wrote:
Sexuality is "outside interference" by another person par excellence and is therefore incompatible with liberal democracy, and is therefore revolutionary. It just can't exist peacefully in the world that most of us live in, day to day, and having any sexual feeling at all is a political compromise.
A discerning reader may notice that everything I said here is basically the opposite of everything I said on a different thread. I mean, why would I defend "liberal" values, which I had JUST SAID were essentially individual freedom from coercion by outside agencies that would seek to bend your will? Well the answer dear readers is that it was COSPLAY.
Sexuality is "outside interference" by another person par excellence and is therefore incompatible with liberal democracy, and is therefore revolutionary. It just can't exist peacefully in the world that most of us live in, day to day, and having any sexual feeling at all is a political compromise.
A discerning reader may notice that everything I said here is basically the opposite of everything I said on a different thread. I mean, why would I defend "liberal" values, which I had JUST SAID were essentially individual freedom from coercion by outside agencies that would seek to bend your will? Well the answer dear readers is that it was COSPLAY.