05-23-2014, 12:09 AM
MY SHARED COMMENT:
At 23:45 it becomes very clear how atheists are using the term "NATURAL SELECTION" in place of the term "GOD". Conduct an experiment and substitute the word "GOD" every time Mr Dawkins says "NATURAL SELECTION" and you realize what you have is just another religion that requires TREMENDOUS FAITH to believe in. What? You don't think it takes tremendous faith to believe that "NATURAL SELECTION" does all the things atheists say it does. 'Trust us! Natural selection is doing all these things, not the Christian God!'
EVIDENCE DOES NOT EQUAL PROOF!!!
This is something atheists don't want to believe and most certainly do not want to admit!
Granted, the Natural Selection religion of BLIND FAITH in the evidence that natural selection did all those things over a period of billions of years DOES NOT REQUIRE WORSHIP. I see that as a very good thing. It also does not require you to love it and natural selection most certainly does not love YOU. That much is for certain!
The religion of natural selection offers you no special love or hope for any rewards after you die, but it also does not threaten you with any punishment, after death, no matter what you may choose to do in life. What a relief to atheist mass murderers!
Personally, I feel it good of me to allow people to believe whatever silly thing they like as long as they don't threaten me unless I believe as they do.
If you want to believe there is no God and that there is only natural selection that does all sorts of amazing things with no consciousness whatsoever; just by accident. That is fine with me. It seems silly to me to blindly believe that natural selection improved the human eye...by accident with no sense of consciousness or aware knowledge of what it was doing.
From my perspective, to believe such things is ridiculously silly and would require tremendous faith on my part, OR ANY WISE PERSON'S PART to believe. That is my view.
People believe in all sorts of ridiculous things and, to me, the THEORY that natural selection did all these miraculous things with complete unawareness and completely by accident is ludicrous to the point of a ridiculous joke. Still, I consider MANY of the things people blindly believe to be a ludicrous joke so it's not so different for me to give the atheists the freedom to believe whatever ridiculous thing they may want to believe.
If the atheists suddenly come up with the THEORY that natural selection wrote everything it has ever done on golden plates it would be just as silly as their atheist blind faith assumptions are to me right now!
At 23:45 it becomes very clear how atheists are using the term "NATURAL SELECTION" in place of the term "GOD". Conduct an experiment and substitute the word "GOD" every time Mr Dawkins says "NATURAL SELECTION" and you realize what you have is just another religion that requires TREMENDOUS FAITH to believe in. What? You don't think it takes tremendous faith to believe that "NATURAL SELECTION" does all the things atheists say it does. 'Trust us! Natural selection is doing all these things, not the Christian God!'
EVIDENCE DOES NOT EQUAL PROOF!!!
This is something atheists don't want to believe and most certainly do not want to admit!
Granted, the Natural Selection religion of BLIND FAITH in the evidence that natural selection did all those things over a period of billions of years DOES NOT REQUIRE WORSHIP. I see that as a very good thing. It also does not require you to love it and natural selection most certainly does not love YOU. That much is for certain!
The religion of natural selection offers you no special love or hope for any rewards after you die, but it also does not threaten you with any punishment, after death, no matter what you may choose to do in life. What a relief to atheist mass murderers!
Personally, I feel it good of me to allow people to believe whatever silly thing they like as long as they don't threaten me unless I believe as they do.
If you want to believe there is no God and that there is only natural selection that does all sorts of amazing things with no consciousness whatsoever; just by accident. That is fine with me. It seems silly to me to blindly believe that natural selection improved the human eye...by accident with no sense of consciousness or aware knowledge of what it was doing.
From my perspective, to believe such things is ridiculously silly and would require tremendous faith on my part, OR ANY WISE PERSON'S PART to believe. That is my view.
People believe in all sorts of ridiculous things and, to me, the THEORY that natural selection did all these miraculous things with complete unawareness and completely by accident is ludicrous to the point of a ridiculous joke. Still, I consider MANY of the things people blindly believe to be a ludicrous joke so it's not so different for me to give the atheists the freedom to believe whatever ridiculous thing they may want to believe.
If the atheists suddenly come up with the THEORY that natural selection wrote everything it has ever done on golden plates it would be just as silly as their atheist blind faith assumptions are to me right now!