06-06-2014, 12:09 AM
MY COMMENT:
At about 31:30 Richard Dawkins presents evidence in response to his question: How do you know your wife loves you? Then he says that you know from evidence. Not scientifically testable evidence, but valid evidence nonetheless. I'm surprised the the Muslim man interviewing him didn't present answers to the question, 'How does he know God loves him?' Now, in this context, the evidence may not be scientifically testable, but it is valid evidence nonetheless!
People believe in God because they have evidence in their lives that God loves them. They see circumstances, that may appear as mere 'coincidence' to others, as being signs of God's love and special concern for them as individuals. No, the evidence may not be scientifically testable, but in accordance with the Richard Dawkins hypothesis, it is evidence nonetheless.
To blindly state that people believe in God with no evidence whatsoever that God exists and loves them personally is the postulation of a fool!!! That was a valuable moment the Muslim asking Dawkins questions let slip right past him.
At about 31:30 Richard Dawkins presents evidence in response to his question: How do you know your wife loves you? Then he says that you know from evidence. Not scientifically testable evidence, but valid evidence nonetheless. I'm surprised the the Muslim man interviewing him didn't present answers to the question, 'How does he know God loves him?' Now, in this context, the evidence may not be scientifically testable, but it is valid evidence nonetheless!
People believe in God because they have evidence in their lives that God loves them. They see circumstances, that may appear as mere 'coincidence' to others, as being signs of God's love and special concern for them as individuals. No, the evidence may not be scientifically testable, but in accordance with the Richard Dawkins hypothesis, it is evidence nonetheless.
To blindly state that people believe in God with no evidence whatsoever that God exists and loves them personally is the postulation of a fool!!! That was a valuable moment the Muslim asking Dawkins questions let slip right past him.