05-11-2015, 12:17 AM
Periodically I would consider that many are the science documentaries
where it is said what atoms are like using computer graphics animations.
However, if what scientists say is true are they getting their information from firsthand observation
or theoretical equations?
So far it has always been, 'Trust us we know what we are talking about regarding atoms'.
Up until this point I have blindly assumed that scientists have come to their conclusions about atoms
from direct observation through powerful electron microscopes. However, it suddenly dawned on me
that science documentaries always tend to use animation to illustrate their teachings about atoms.
I decided to go to YouTube to see if ANYONE has made video recordings of actual atoms
so that I can verify that they do indeed look like the animation models WE HAVE BEEN BRAINWASHED WITH!
I FOUND NO SUCH VIDEOS!!!!
IT'S A MATTER OF TAKING THE WORD OF SCIENCE THAT ATOMS LOOK THE WAY THEY SAY THEY DO!!!
Kind of reminds me of people expecting us to take their word for it that Jesus actually walked on water.
Oh, they can come up with animations of Jesus walking on water, but that's not the same as actually seeing Jesus walking on water, right?
So science expects us to blindly trust them that one species can eventually turn into a completely different species, given enough time.
They also expect us to blindly believe that atoms look like their animations of them. Hmmmm. I am suspecting a scam here!!
Okay, these are supposed to be REAL photos of actual atoms.
Note how they look NOTHING LIKE those classic animated models WE HAVE BEEN BRAINWASHED WITH!!!
http://pixshark.com/real-pictures-of-atoms.htm
Seems this animated structure of atoms is a bunch of baloney.
This is not the way atoms look AT ALL!! IT'S A SCAM CON JOB!!!!
https://www.google.com/search?site=&tbm ... Y70wX8ECCw#
It seems that the human race has no end to their damned con jobs.
They are liar tricksters and NOTHING they say should be blindly trusted!!
YES, THE ILLUMINATI INCLUDED!!!!
The damned bullshit human race!!!!
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!
QUESTION: "Has anyone ever seen electrons and protons under the microscope?
ONE ANSWER: No.
An optical microscope cannot resolve (visual) features smaller than about 200 nanometers (due to the Rayliegh criterion),
and for comparison, a carbon atom has a diameter of 0.34 nanometers (van der Waals' value).
None of these values are actually closer to the 'size' of an electron, and hence, one cannot 'see' an electron (or for that matter, any subatomic particle).
However, techniques such as Scanning Probe Microscopies can resolve atomic scale features (0.1 Angstroms is the finest),
but they produce surface topographies by giving a map of different features (such as electronic charge distribution for a scanning tunnelling microscope)
than actual visual data, that we refer to as 'seeing' macroscopically.
So, one cannot 'see' subatomic particles (in the literal sense of the word) such as electrons, protons, etc."
http://www.quora.com/Has-anyone-ever-se ... microscope
MY COMMENT:
In other words, 'take their word for it'
THEY CAN'T SEE ELECTRONS WITH
((( ELECTRON MICROSCOPES!! )))
WHAT KIND OF FUCKING BULLSHIT IS THIS??!!!!!
Damn science scam artists!!!
where it is said what atoms are like using computer graphics animations.
However, if what scientists say is true are they getting their information from firsthand observation
or theoretical equations?
So far it has always been, 'Trust us we know what we are talking about regarding atoms'.
Up until this point I have blindly assumed that scientists have come to their conclusions about atoms
from direct observation through powerful electron microscopes. However, it suddenly dawned on me
that science documentaries always tend to use animation to illustrate their teachings about atoms.
I decided to go to YouTube to see if ANYONE has made video recordings of actual atoms
so that I can verify that they do indeed look like the animation models WE HAVE BEEN BRAINWASHED WITH!
I FOUND NO SUCH VIDEOS!!!!
IT'S A MATTER OF TAKING THE WORD OF SCIENCE THAT ATOMS LOOK THE WAY THEY SAY THEY DO!!!
Kind of reminds me of people expecting us to take their word for it that Jesus actually walked on water.
Oh, they can come up with animations of Jesus walking on water, but that's not the same as actually seeing Jesus walking on water, right?
So science expects us to blindly trust them that one species can eventually turn into a completely different species, given enough time.
They also expect us to blindly believe that atoms look like their animations of them. Hmmmm. I am suspecting a scam here!!
Okay, these are supposed to be REAL photos of actual atoms.
Note how they look NOTHING LIKE those classic animated models WE HAVE BEEN BRAINWASHED WITH!!!
http://pixshark.com/real-pictures-of-atoms.htm
Seems this animated structure of atoms is a bunch of baloney.
This is not the way atoms look AT ALL!! IT'S A SCAM CON JOB!!!!
https://www.google.com/search?site=&tbm ... Y70wX8ECCw#
It seems that the human race has no end to their damned con jobs.
They are liar tricksters and NOTHING they say should be blindly trusted!!
YES, THE ILLUMINATI INCLUDED!!!!
The damned bullshit human race!!!!
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!
QUESTION: "Has anyone ever seen electrons and protons under the microscope?
ONE ANSWER: No.
An optical microscope cannot resolve (visual) features smaller than about 200 nanometers (due to the Rayliegh criterion),
and for comparison, a carbon atom has a diameter of 0.34 nanometers (van der Waals' value).
None of these values are actually closer to the 'size' of an electron, and hence, one cannot 'see' an electron (or for that matter, any subatomic particle).
However, techniques such as Scanning Probe Microscopies can resolve atomic scale features (0.1 Angstroms is the finest),
but they produce surface topographies by giving a map of different features (such as electronic charge distribution for a scanning tunnelling microscope)
than actual visual data, that we refer to as 'seeing' macroscopically.
So, one cannot 'see' subatomic particles (in the literal sense of the word) such as electrons, protons, etc."
http://www.quora.com/Has-anyone-ever-se ... microscope
MY COMMENT:
In other words, 'take their word for it'
THEY CAN'T SEE ELECTRONS WITH
((( ELECTRON MICROSCOPES!! )))
WHAT KIND OF FUCKING BULLSHIT IS THIS??!!!!!
Damn science scam artists!!!