02-02-2016, 12:01 AM
The paradox is only seemingly, since you tend to the tonal fully in self-importance, but keep the spiritual undercurrent as the permeating force. Yet, there is nothing false in conversion to the tonal. That is, you REALLY are critically self-important in the tonal by giving attention to your work of vocation, family, and goals as the very essence of being spiritual.
Nothing other than the subtle disposition of holding to the conventional acts as spiritual is different from another who is attached to the vocation, family, and goals.
The acts are spiritual in and of themselves on one hand and not the other. Understand?
So, when you come to the crux of moving from a well groomed detachment in the tonal to one that is existentially consumptive in emptiness, this act is complete. You have total knowledge that the tonal is controlled folly, and thus assume indifference.
***.. words don't cut it, but I'm trying (smile)
Nothing other than the subtle disposition of holding to the conventional acts as spiritual is different from another who is attached to the vocation, family, and goals.
The acts are spiritual in and of themselves on one hand and not the other. Understand?
So, when you come to the crux of moving from a well groomed detachment in the tonal to one that is existentially consumptive in emptiness, this act is complete. You have total knowledge that the tonal is controlled folly, and thus assume indifference.
***.. words don't cut it, but I'm trying (smile)