11-06-2016, 12:38 AM
The warrior, hunter and the human/nagual operate at three points of a triangle.each position has an objective present and a subjective totaltiy to each of the other two.
so for instance a warrior would be objective to being a hunter as he is choosing to battle not hunt.however in totality he would be subjective to the human form/nagual. ( this is the world of inorganic beings)
A hunter on the other hand would be objective to normal man and in totality he would be subjective to the warrior.(this is the 2nd enemy position, that of sobriety ending with the death of the sorcerer)
a human in the normal assemblage position wiill be split objectuve between the warrior and hunter as he only sees normal people with different actions as theirperception.. the totality portion woill be bilocated with the human as a nagual being (other).
for this reason normal people in their midst of folly are still gateways to the nagual in totality.Hunters in the midst of their folly are still gateways to objective forebearence in their totalitywarriors in the midst of their folly are gateways to the subjective forebearance in their totality.
(i think this is right)
so for instance a warrior would be objective to being a hunter as he is choosing to battle not hunt.however in totality he would be subjective to the human form/nagual. ( this is the world of inorganic beings)
A hunter on the other hand would be objective to normal man and in totality he would be subjective to the warrior.(this is the 2nd enemy position, that of sobriety ending with the death of the sorcerer)
a human in the normal assemblage position wiill be split objectuve between the warrior and hunter as he only sees normal people with different actions as theirperception.. the totality portion woill be bilocated with the human as a nagual being (other).
for this reason normal people in their midst of folly are still gateways to the nagual in totality.Hunters in the midst of their folly are still gateways to objective forebearence in their totalitywarriors in the midst of their folly are gateways to the subjective forebearance in their totality.
(i think this is right)