05-06-2015, 12:03 AM
serloco wrote:you don't like the forum billy? I thought you were making friends and enjoyed it here.. will be sad to see your absence.
billy > I LOVE this forum; I share an affinty with persons here where I do no where else. I mean to say I looked up and down 'religiously' to get your entries and tilled much from others also, but I will not concert an effort for a while. Even so, I probably will sign in often to show presence and conjoin as the spirit moves. I SEE this posturing as strategic too.
To my friends in forum: I have not articulated my radical thrust that challenges many positions at the heart of being. I am meaning (smiling) to do so....
For example: I can't understand a universality of a consciousness evolving in awareness; this makes no sense on any level to me. First off, is the implicit judgement of a necessity, or an idea that perfection (or ISness) is incomplete (now).
I want to talk with delawaredan of 'quantum knowledge' afixed to DNA evolutionary traits. I want that arena specifically to explore reducing existence to nought. I am opposed to 'meaning' much more than 'self' hood.
The slant here by some to eliminate 'I' makes sense on most levels, excepting the one that matters to 'me.' {Any judgement in such regard (beyond that in 'serloco' fluidity) renders a very certain 'self' hypocrisy (lol)}
THANK YOU to EVERYONE, (more than a dozen here), who has given me pleasure.
This is my favorite internet site, milleniums beyond any other. I did thank LoneWolf once. I thank him again...and again.
My strength has been my proclivity to to acquiesce, detach, and trump conditions (And I mean the ordinarily nasty, testing ones/billy has done SOME here). billy is probably as grounded as anyone here possibly can be, but billy TRULY appreciates the thoughts here that supercede cultural convention.
billy > I LOVE this forum; I share an affinty with persons here where I do no where else. I mean to say I looked up and down 'religiously' to get your entries and tilled much from others also, but I will not concert an effort for a while. Even so, I probably will sign in often to show presence and conjoin as the spirit moves. I SEE this posturing as strategic too.
To my friends in forum: I have not articulated my radical thrust that challenges many positions at the heart of being. I am meaning (smiling) to do so....
For example: I can't understand a universality of a consciousness evolving in awareness; this makes no sense on any level to me. First off, is the implicit judgement of a necessity, or an idea that perfection (or ISness) is incomplete (now).
I want to talk with delawaredan of 'quantum knowledge' afixed to DNA evolutionary traits. I want that arena specifically to explore reducing existence to nought. I am opposed to 'meaning' much more than 'self' hood.
The slant here by some to eliminate 'I' makes sense on most levels, excepting the one that matters to 'me.' {Any judgement in such regard (beyond that in 'serloco' fluidity) renders a very certain 'self' hypocrisy (lol)}
THANK YOU to EVERYONE, (more than a dozen here), who has given me pleasure.
This is my favorite internet site, milleniums beyond any other. I did thank LoneWolf once. I thank him again...and again.
My strength has been my proclivity to to acquiesce, detach, and trump conditions (And I mean the ordinarily nasty, testing ones/billy has done SOME here). billy is probably as grounded as anyone here possibly can be, but billy TRULY appreciates the thoughts here that supercede cultural convention.

