09-09-2008, 12:03 AM
"Aura seeing is not the same as nagual seeing.
To this day I haven't heard once that any seer of auras sees the assemblage point nor the luminous fibers.
They are two different alignments and forms of perceptions. Most mystics, even the high ones, don't see the AP nor the fibers.
Seeing is alignment. Nagual seership alignment is very different in nature. "
There seem to be different levels of seeing the "aura" for lack of a better word. The closest to Don Juan's description of this seeing that
I've run across is C.W. Leadbeater's book Man, Visible and Invisible. He considered himself a "Clairvoyant" and has many water colored
paintings of what he could see. He called these "levels" or "depths" of seeing the subtle bodies of man.
http://www.anandgholap.ne...ble_And_Invisible-CWL.htm
To this day I haven't heard once that any seer of auras sees the assemblage point nor the luminous fibers.
They are two different alignments and forms of perceptions. Most mystics, even the high ones, don't see the AP nor the fibers.
Seeing is alignment. Nagual seership alignment is very different in nature. "
There seem to be different levels of seeing the "aura" for lack of a better word. The closest to Don Juan's description of this seeing that
I've run across is C.W. Leadbeater's book Man, Visible and Invisible. He considered himself a "Clairvoyant" and has many water colored
paintings of what he could see. He called these "levels" or "depths" of seeing the subtle bodies of man.
http://www.anandgholap.ne...ble_And_Invisible-CWL.htm