06-18-2006, 12:00 AM
p098.ezboard.com/fnagualf...D=18.topic
Quote:I can't believe you guys have fallen for this. I can also guarantee you there is no eagle out there ready to devour you. You have simply acquiesced to a description and this description has consumed you before your death has even touched your shoulder. Beyond our living construct exists energetic filaments of light that are opportunistically random within their presentation and the reason that they are random within their presentation is that they are adapting to all forms of desire that manifest intent; whether organic or inorganic. Unfortunately this construct yields to us in retrospect; in essence everything escapes us and then manifests as if it has taken time for that manifestation to occur. So in essence our intent has been slowed down by virtue of being here. It is not immediate.
Beyond these templates exists a void beyond proportion that is the main player behind all that exists. There is no eagle. Get a grip guys.
Lujan Quote:Guys - think about it this way.
Castaneda was an anthropologist; a social scientist.
Their primary job is to observe behavioral patterns within a social structure. The ultimate experiment as a social scientist would be to take solid verifiable truths and then upon these truths elongate the terminology through trickery.
Some of this trickery obviously has the interactive aspect of truth within it if one has the elasticity to see through the maneuvers put forth.
But remember, the terminologies that become a fixation, which are not the truth, are the ideologies that are seen to be beyond the description within our living construct that will be defended regardless of the basic truths known by that individual.
So we can surmise maybe there are some social scientists in the background behind this knowing the truths and knowing the entrapments through the trickery put forth.
Collecting data on a large scale in the largest social science experiment ever conducted.
But the contradiction within this is that Juan Matus did exist. Where are the truths and where is the deception? That is the question.
Or Castaneda himself did it all by his little lonesome.
For all you bird watchers the post above has been edited.
p098.ezboard.com/fnagualf...D=18.topic
Lujan Matus [/b]
Quote: A good friend of mine said today.
What do you think of this ? When a mental concept is manifested into existence by an individual, a witness of that concept will adapt the manifestation to their own inner conviction, and by liberty of that adaptation, what is seen by the witness will be the manifestation maintaining it self through application within the resources of the individual.
what are you doing
[/b]
If we look we assume; If we see we know.
Quote:Our death awaits us upon those fragments,that are confronting us at every moment that has escaped us. Within that premise the crushing gaze of death pushes upon us to act relentlessly until the moment that our essence is exhausted.
Lujan
Quote: One thing that I have noticed with CC devotees is that they refer to the terminologies as if referring to the bible. It is not the books that should speak; it is the inner voice of the warrior.
One can refer to terminology but if it is only the terminology one is referring to then they are accessing a static reservoir which was originally only meant to inform and from this state the warrior can be propelled beyond the original information that corresponds to the warriors voice and not to the original voice that came from the books because in essence that original voice is but a foundation.
CC said once: these damn books. What he meant by that is people identify so strongly with the fluid terminology that the fluidity of themself has been forgotten and this internal fluidity that belongs to a warrior adapts and facilitates to that which is presented.
A much better state of being I'd say.
Think about it this way: Castaneda couldn't even save himself from his own internal pain that ripped his organs apart at the moment he was dying. He needed a morphine drip to cope with his inevitable moment that crushed the very essence that he possessed. So even if he could not save himself and he was the author and also the recipient of that information from the source, then in the end what chance does a warrior have on their path if they do not start using their own voice?
The danger of the terminologies from CC's books is that they help one trap another within the premise of logical reasoning. If you don't find this frightening then your death at the end of your traversing will frighten you.
Lujan [/b]
Quote:Well my friend, think of it this way: Is it the devil in the details or is it the detail in the devil that waylays?
There are many seers as Castaneda said. There are small seers and big seers and what he was referring to is seeing in terms of rationale, and depending on the speed of that rationale one so-called seer can wrap many up in an endless knot because of the speed perceived by that rational , and remember the seer does not see energy per-say; he sees a comparative interaction of energy too his fellow man and then flags landmarked sites to draw awareness to that site to the extent where energy is trapped there in the defence of that terminology given, and the original perspective is forgotten; that person's originality; their life path.
Think about it. [/b]
Lujan Matus
In the end we are the sum total of our doings and we will be faced by those doings at the moment of our death. Or is it our death in every moment that we live, that faces us with what we do?
Quote:I can't believe you guys have fallen for this. I can also guarantee you there is no eagle out there ready to devour you. You have simply acquiesced to a description and this description has consumed you before your death has even touched your shoulder. Beyond our living construct exists energetic filaments of light that are opportunistically random within their presentation and the reason that they are random within their presentation is that they are adapting to all forms of desire that manifest intent; whether organic or inorganic. Unfortunately this construct yields to us in retrospect; in essence everything escapes us and then manifests as if it has taken time for that manifestation to occur. So in essence our intent has been slowed down by virtue of being here. It is not immediate.
Beyond these templates exists a void beyond proportion that is the main player behind all that exists. There is no eagle. Get a grip guys.
Lujan Quote:Guys - think about it this way.
Castaneda was an anthropologist; a social scientist.
Their primary job is to observe behavioral patterns within a social structure. The ultimate experiment as a social scientist would be to take solid verifiable truths and then upon these truths elongate the terminology through trickery.
Some of this trickery obviously has the interactive aspect of truth within it if one has the elasticity to see through the maneuvers put forth.
But remember, the terminologies that become a fixation, which are not the truth, are the ideologies that are seen to be beyond the description within our living construct that will be defended regardless of the basic truths known by that individual.
So we can surmise maybe there are some social scientists in the background behind this knowing the truths and knowing the entrapments through the trickery put forth.
Collecting data on a large scale in the largest social science experiment ever conducted.
But the contradiction within this is that Juan Matus did exist. Where are the truths and where is the deception? That is the question.
Or Castaneda himself did it all by his little lonesome.
For all you bird watchers the post above has been edited.
p098.ezboard.com/fnagualf...D=18.topic
Lujan Matus [/b]
Quote: A good friend of mine said today.
What do you think of this ? When a mental concept is manifested into existence by an individual, a witness of that concept will adapt the manifestation to their own inner conviction, and by liberty of that adaptation, what is seen by the witness will be the manifestation maintaining it self through application within the resources of the individual.
what are you doing
[/b]
If we look we assume; If we see we know.
Quote:Our death awaits us upon those fragments,that are confronting us at every moment that has escaped us. Within that premise the crushing gaze of death pushes upon us to act relentlessly until the moment that our essence is exhausted.
Lujan
Quote: One thing that I have noticed with CC devotees is that they refer to the terminologies as if referring to the bible. It is not the books that should speak; it is the inner voice of the warrior.
One can refer to terminology but if it is only the terminology one is referring to then they are accessing a static reservoir which was originally only meant to inform and from this state the warrior can be propelled beyond the original information that corresponds to the warriors voice and not to the original voice that came from the books because in essence that original voice is but a foundation.
CC said once: these damn books. What he meant by that is people identify so strongly with the fluid terminology that the fluidity of themself has been forgotten and this internal fluidity that belongs to a warrior adapts and facilitates to that which is presented.
A much better state of being I'd say.
Think about it this way: Castaneda couldn't even save himself from his own internal pain that ripped his organs apart at the moment he was dying. He needed a morphine drip to cope with his inevitable moment that crushed the very essence that he possessed. So even if he could not save himself and he was the author and also the recipient of that information from the source, then in the end what chance does a warrior have on their path if they do not start using their own voice?
The danger of the terminologies from CC's books is that they help one trap another within the premise of logical reasoning. If you don't find this frightening then your death at the end of your traversing will frighten you.
Lujan [/b]
Quote:Well my friend, think of it this way: Is it the devil in the details or is it the detail in the devil that waylays?
There are many seers as Castaneda said. There are small seers and big seers and what he was referring to is seeing in terms of rationale, and depending on the speed of that rationale one so-called seer can wrap many up in an endless knot because of the speed perceived by that rational , and remember the seer does not see energy per-say; he sees a comparative interaction of energy too his fellow man and then flags landmarked sites to draw awareness to that site to the extent where energy is trapped there in the defence of that terminology given, and the original perspective is forgotten; that person's originality; their life path.
Think about it. [/b]
Lujan Matus
In the end we are the sum total of our doings and we will be faced by those doings at the moment of our death. Or is it our death in every moment that we live, that faces us with what we do?