06-19-2006, 12:00 AM
Death
Quote:When we look at the very premise, the functionality of any precept, we are guided by that concept and within the terminology outlined are given a general foundation to proceed from; a reference point or cornerstone.
From this cornerstone each individual, through the function of simultaneous enhancement, will build a construct that will align, by virtue of the experience of that individuals life path.
But of course the parameters outlined above are linear and through the absorption of linear conceptualization one can be absorbed within that in an endless loop of reasoning that beckons the linear concept to fall back on its originality if simultaneous enhancement has not been grasped as a tool for the life path of any individual proceeding in their endeavors to know more than the original construct of consciousness within their cognitive system delivered to them through their syntax.
Death is one example. Juan Matus said to CC, Your death is to your left. If you observe it from the perspective that does not interfere you will see it slip away behind that rock, waiting for its inevitable moment to touch upon your spirit within this living construct.
This is true but truth can deceive in terms of governing ones potential through actualizing individual awareness down an avenue of conceptualization that holds the conceived concept in the rationale that death awaits upon the warriors path, on the left, to tap that warrior upon the left shoulder.
This serves as a foundation but death itself is a function of life and life functions in abeyance in terms of that functionality, waiting for its inevitable end. Every gesture, everything that can be conceived of that has escaped us has as its primary force, death, behind it.
So within every conceivable construct within the compartmentalized universes that exist within the fabric of that inescapable time that has escaped us, we must be aware of what we do, because within essence everything that manifests reestablishes itself as an encompassing load that governs all compartments that exist within that multiplex that is the universe that we perceive; whether in linear form or lateral assimilation in that which can be perceived through the seeing.
So in essence are we to be governed by a rationale of immortality or governed by the fact that our death exists within every moment that is escaping us upon that immense compartmentalization that is our existence intertwined with the existence of everything that has touched upon our awareness through the fusion of that intent which is the complexity of our being?[/b]
Lujan Matus
In the end we are the sum total of our doings and we will be faced by those doings at the moment of our death. Or is it our death in every moment that we live, that faces us with what we do?
Quote:When we look at the very premise, the functionality of any precept, we are guided by that concept and within the terminology outlined are given a general foundation to proceed from; a reference point or cornerstone.
From this cornerstone each individual, through the function of simultaneous enhancement, will build a construct that will align, by virtue of the experience of that individuals life path.
But of course the parameters outlined above are linear and through the absorption of linear conceptualization one can be absorbed within that in an endless loop of reasoning that beckons the linear concept to fall back on its originality if simultaneous enhancement has not been grasped as a tool for the life path of any individual proceeding in their endeavors to know more than the original construct of consciousness within their cognitive system delivered to them through their syntax.
Death is one example. Juan Matus said to CC, Your death is to your left. If you observe it from the perspective that does not interfere you will see it slip away behind that rock, waiting for its inevitable moment to touch upon your spirit within this living construct.
This is true but truth can deceive in terms of governing ones potential through actualizing individual awareness down an avenue of conceptualization that holds the conceived concept in the rationale that death awaits upon the warriors path, on the left, to tap that warrior upon the left shoulder.
This serves as a foundation but death itself is a function of life and life functions in abeyance in terms of that functionality, waiting for its inevitable end. Every gesture, everything that can be conceived of that has escaped us has as its primary force, death, behind it.
So within every conceivable construct within the compartmentalized universes that exist within the fabric of that inescapable time that has escaped us, we must be aware of what we do, because within essence everything that manifests reestablishes itself as an encompassing load that governs all compartments that exist within that multiplex that is the universe that we perceive; whether in linear form or lateral assimilation in that which can be perceived through the seeing.
So in essence are we to be governed by a rationale of immortality or governed by the fact that our death exists within every moment that is escaping us upon that immense compartmentalization that is our existence intertwined with the existence of everything that has touched upon our awareness through the fusion of that intent which is the complexity of our being?[/b]
Lujan Matus
In the end we are the sum total of our doings and we will be faced by those doings at the moment of our death. Or is it our death in every moment that we live, that faces us with what we do?