06-27-2006, 12:00 AM
Quote:When the other dreams us is it seeking renewal through the inference of light that is being transformed within the living construct?
And is not the transformation recreating itself through the neurological processes of light that create the dreamer, which in the end finds its source in the dreamed, or the other?
Is this not seeking equilibrium?
And do we not within dimension compartmentalize constructs and from these constructs source information that is either relevant to the fixation or evident upon the truth of that fixation?
So in essence within this compartmentalized state do we draw from those constructs fragments that become our present day cognition that is reinforced through syntax? And if not reinforced through syntax then is that fixation a reflection of the truth that is continually escaping us upon the point that we wish to fixate?
And in the elucidation of those concepts is this also not seeking equilibrium through the construction of fragments that have been accessed from various compartmentalized constructs?
Is this not the way that we traverse the unknown through consolidating these known procedures into an elucidation that moves from the original constructs that in essence are compartmentalized by virtue of being fractured by extraction? And the term associated to this process is evolution; whether it be structurally admissible in terms of verification, or verified through directly knowing through ones seeing.
The amalgamation of the two latter is of essence; essentially true physics. And are not anthropology and physics to be combined to bring about this union?
When one sees and then traverses upon that light that one sees, the light within itself does seek equilibrium in comparison to that, which has sourced its essence. But in actuality that essence within itself is baseless; void like. In the end we are the sum total of our doings and we will be faced by those doings at the moment of our death. Or is it our death in every moment that we live, that faces us with what we do?
And is not the transformation recreating itself through the neurological processes of light that create the dreamer, which in the end finds its source in the dreamed, or the other?
Is this not seeking equilibrium?
And do we not within dimension compartmentalize constructs and from these constructs source information that is either relevant to the fixation or evident upon the truth of that fixation?
So in essence within this compartmentalized state do we draw from those constructs fragments that become our present day cognition that is reinforced through syntax? And if not reinforced through syntax then is that fixation a reflection of the truth that is continually escaping us upon the point that we wish to fixate?
And in the elucidation of those concepts is this also not seeking equilibrium through the construction of fragments that have been accessed from various compartmentalized constructs?
Is this not the way that we traverse the unknown through consolidating these known procedures into an elucidation that moves from the original constructs that in essence are compartmentalized by virtue of being fractured by extraction? And the term associated to this process is evolution; whether it be structurally admissible in terms of verification, or verified through directly knowing through ones seeing.
The amalgamation of the two latter is of essence; essentially true physics. And are not anthropology and physics to be combined to bring about this union?
When one sees and then traverses upon that light that one sees, the light within itself does seek equilibrium in comparison to that, which has sourced its essence. But in actuality that essence within itself is baseless; void like. In the end we are the sum total of our doings and we will be faced by those doings at the moment of our death. Or is it our death in every moment that we live, that faces us with what we do?