04-09-2015, 12:00 AM
Finwe wrote:Accurate points of seeing Oculus, basically - the moment - seal of third attention is broken the whole attention solicits change while beign same. Being the Opening in any way only of the reason based as intent of the double nature of universe. Way the seal is broken, exists and comes into being with the formation of it's energies, that is the whole dreaming body in sense of all dreams that exists through luminousity wheter physical, astral, solar, pranic, nagual, primary or animal. This is the difference between us, Humans and Inorganic Beings, they are not under any means viable, naturaly, because of their energetic structure, to break it, they roll in themselves, while under same conditions, we burn from within
I understand every word here conceptually; and you infer you have broken from the dreaming so as to roll within if you are an IOB, or burn within as a human after reaching the third attention. Are you an IOB Finwe?
If you have burned within, is it that you intended 'self ' to return to bodily form? If so, please elucidate that.
If neither, are you projecting only conceptually as learned in another attention? That is you SEE this? Are you ever in the dreaming body? Why, as serloco poses, do you persist in your bent towards favoring nothing as death, rather than nothing as creative form. That is, serloco sees both sides as equally intrinsic and essential. You did not. Why?
I compliment you for your articulation, but question your veracity in either knowing the truth or/and telling the truth.
I am smiling and not abound with any vitriol.
I understand every word here conceptually; and you infer you have broken from the dreaming so as to roll within if you are an IOB, or burn within as a human after reaching the third attention. Are you an IOB Finwe?
If you have burned within, is it that you intended 'self ' to return to bodily form? If so, please elucidate that.
If neither, are you projecting only conceptually as learned in another attention? That is you SEE this? Are you ever in the dreaming body? Why, as serloco poses, do you persist in your bent towards favoring nothing as death, rather than nothing as creative form. That is, serloco sees both sides as equally intrinsic and essential. You did not. Why?
I compliment you for your articulation, but question your veracity in either knowing the truth or/and telling the truth.
I am smiling and not abound with any vitriol.