09-08-2011, 12:01 AM
This thread is about the skeptics and the
Castaneda Legacy forum so it belongs in this forum. I've made it easy
enough for any or you to discuss any part of the post you may want to
address. If you are not intelligent enough to see that then your opinion
about these matters is not worth reading.
If you want to make an intelligent comment about PART 1 then refer to PART 1
If you want to make an intelligent comment about PART 2 then refer to PART 2
Etcetera
Do I really need to make it simpler?
If you have no intelligent comment to make then go elsewhere instead of complaining like a senile little old lady!
So,
what do you think of PART 1? Or is it too difficult for you to
understand? Do you see yourself as more qualified than the
anthropological experts at UCLA to judge whether or not Castaneda
deserved a Ph. D for Journey To Ixtlan?
It seems more and more
obvious to me that my efforts here are pointless. Jeremy and Guy will
continue to hide and the skeptics are too dishonest to admit the truth
of what I have shared. That's okay.
Now, of course, Tom will complain about something or other without making any intelligent comment.
So
Tom. When you complain and make no intelligent comment, as I have seen
you often do in this forum, you openly admit that you agree with all of
my premises in the process whether you openly admit it or not
The same goes for all of you who complain without addressing any of the issues I have raised!
If
Jeremy Donovan had the guts to meet me in a forum where we both have
equal pull I would not be here now. Since he is a spineless coward I
have come to him in the skeptics proverbial 'lion's den' and still he
hides even with Tom ready to protect him from me. See your "hero" for
what he truly is, people!
"It's like I always say ... they can't all be right. But they could all be wrong..."
Jeremy Talking Dog
MY COMMENT:
Or
they can all be right in some ways and wrong in others. Couldn't think
up the third option on your own, eh Jeremy? Glad I could help
Castaneda Legacy forum so it belongs in this forum. I've made it easy
enough for any or you to discuss any part of the post you may want to
address. If you are not intelligent enough to see that then your opinion
about these matters is not worth reading.
If you want to make an intelligent comment about PART 1 then refer to PART 1
If you want to make an intelligent comment about PART 2 then refer to PART 2
Etcetera
Do I really need to make it simpler?
If you have no intelligent comment to make then go elsewhere instead of complaining like a senile little old lady!
So,
what do you think of PART 1? Or is it too difficult for you to
understand? Do you see yourself as more qualified than the
anthropological experts at UCLA to judge whether or not Castaneda
deserved a Ph. D for Journey To Ixtlan?
It seems more and more
obvious to me that my efforts here are pointless. Jeremy and Guy will
continue to hide and the skeptics are too dishonest to admit the truth
of what I have shared. That's okay.
Now, of course, Tom will complain about something or other without making any intelligent comment.
So
Tom. When you complain and make no intelligent comment, as I have seen
you often do in this forum, you openly admit that you agree with all of
my premises in the process whether you openly admit it or not
The same goes for all of you who complain without addressing any of the issues I have raised!
If
Jeremy Donovan had the guts to meet me in a forum where we both have
equal pull I would not be here now. Since he is a spineless coward I
have come to him in the skeptics proverbial 'lion's den' and still he
hides even with Tom ready to protect him from me. See your "hero" for
what he truly is, people!
"It's like I always say ... they can't all be right. But they could all be wrong..."
Jeremy Talking Dog
MY COMMENT:
Or
they can all be right in some ways and wrong in others. Couldn't think
up the third option on your own, eh Jeremy? Glad I could help