09-16-2011, 12:02 AM
Gonzo wrote:BarefootInTheSand wrote:Gonzo wrote:They mean what he expects them to mean - an opportunity for combat. If you bother to read what he writes, that's his primary purpose. Apparently he chooses not to engage with me, which is his choice. The last thing Sacateca wants, however, is to be ignored. In that, he is rather successful, but moreso on his "home" forum.
I don't expect Sacateca to change anything...why should he? The purpose of my post at him was to see if he wanted to engage in some combat. He declined. Instead, it appears, you decided to engage.
In regard change, nobody changes. The best anyone can do is manage to reveal himself to himself, what don Juan called achieving the totality of self. That total uncovering of self does not change self...it is enlightenment in its true form.
Your posts are utter nonsense Gonzo. You say his posts are meaningless entertainment, however, you may not see it yet, but your interpretation ^ is filled with the meaning it has for you...the meaning you have given it. Yet you don't know what he intended, felt, or wanted. Your assumption that he wanted combat is a reflection of what is inside you. His unwillingness to engage in combat with you is a pretty clear indicator that combat was not something he wanted...seems you were wrong.
What the f do you mean revealing himself to himself...DJ said cut the chains of self reflection...go back and do your homework. Enlightenment is the transcendence of self, the overcoming of the need to obsess on the self.
Hi, barefoot...
Let me say, IMHO, Sacateca (aka Sid, aka Sidarthur, et al) has as a sole purpose, combat. I say that because I've read a good deal of his stuff on this forum and others and what he says is usually controversial garbage and when others confront him, he does his best to insult them. If you doubt that, check him out on yuku.sustainedreaction.com.
and re enlightenment, I disagree...it is the ultimate exaltation of self. I might ask you who becomes enlightened...who pursues enlightenment? and why?
You fail to see the difference between your interpretation and fact. You state your perceptions as facts...this is useless drivel. Even in your diserntation on what enlightenment means for you...exalting your self (sounds like playing with yourself)...totally worthless drivel. You don't like S because he is a lot like you...neither one of you can make your point.
I don't expect Sacateca to change anything...why should he? The purpose of my post at him was to see if he wanted to engage in some combat. He declined. Instead, it appears, you decided to engage.
In regard change, nobody changes. The best anyone can do is manage to reveal himself to himself, what don Juan called achieving the totality of self. That total uncovering of self does not change self...it is enlightenment in its true form.
Your posts are utter nonsense Gonzo. You say his posts are meaningless entertainment, however, you may not see it yet, but your interpretation ^ is filled with the meaning it has for you...the meaning you have given it. Yet you don't know what he intended, felt, or wanted. Your assumption that he wanted combat is a reflection of what is inside you. His unwillingness to engage in combat with you is a pretty clear indicator that combat was not something he wanted...seems you were wrong.
What the f do you mean revealing himself to himself...DJ said cut the chains of self reflection...go back and do your homework. Enlightenment is the transcendence of self, the overcoming of the need to obsess on the self.
Hi, barefoot...
Let me say, IMHO, Sacateca (aka Sid, aka Sidarthur, et al) has as a sole purpose, combat. I say that because I've read a good deal of his stuff on this forum and others and what he says is usually controversial garbage and when others confront him, he does his best to insult them. If you doubt that, check him out on yuku.sustainedreaction.com.
and re enlightenment, I disagree...it is the ultimate exaltation of self. I might ask you who becomes enlightened...who pursues enlightenment? and why?
You fail to see the difference between your interpretation and fact. You state your perceptions as facts...this is useless drivel. Even in your diserntation on what enlightenment means for you...exalting your self (sounds like playing with yourself)...totally worthless drivel. You don't like S because he is a lot like you...neither one of you can make your point.