09-23-2011, 12:03 AM
INTRODUCTION:
I've come to the conclusion that the entire Sustained Action site, including the Sustained Reaction message board forum, was created on the premise that Richard DeMille's book, about Carlos Castaneda, was the equivalent of 'Gospel Truth'. Yes, I now feel that it was the belief in the infallible credibility of Richard DeMille that led to the creation of the whole Sustained Action and Reaction sites. So, all I have to do is take apart the credibility of Richard DeMille and I will tear the foundational premise of this forum apart by its proverbial seams!
That is what I currently believe and that is why I wrote UCLA the email I have shared here.
From my studies, the credibility of Richard DeMille has already been damaged by his own **** blundering. He had to create an updated version of his book apologizing for his INCORRECT statement concerning mushrooms growing in the Sonora desert. I have little doubt that before DeMille created that apology the knuckleheaded TB idiots just blindly took DeMille at his word. Such are the ways of blind, knuckleheaded TB idiots. They tend to blindly believe, like the idiots they truly are. Corey and Jeremy Donovan OBVIOUSLY went from being Castaneda TB idiots to Richard DeMille TB idiots without hardly skipping a proverbial beat.
_______________________________________
TOM WROTE:
"Tell us, Solecat. How have you changed your behavior to improve your life?"
MY RESPONSE:
Wanting an answer to that question has got to be the most important thing anyone can currently ask in this forum, right Tom?
Well, everyone here knows I can indeed answer this question, about myself, with proof that I have improved my life by curtailing my vile insults in this forum. I feel that you were so impressed that, instead of just one-post per day, you gave me three-posts a day. However, I am curious: Do others here deserve the right to create more than three-posts a day because you feel they are wiser than I am? Or is it because you feel they are dumber than YOU are and you enjoy looking down on them and secretly laughing to yourself?
Does Coconuts deserve the right to create as many YouTube link posts as he likes because he is wiser than I am? Really??
Once you gave me the option to create 3 posts a day Jeremy Donovan ran from the forum like a bat out of a cave with spotlights turned on. He ran back to Greece, with Guy Gardner, and obviously intends to stay there. You see, Jeremy was only comfortable responding to me as long as he had the advantage to create as many posts as he liked and I was limited to one-post a day. People like Jeremy are only comfortable when they can debate with an unfair advantage. On a level playing field people like Jeremy Donovan run like cowards. If this were not so I would have debated him in a neutral forum where neither of us had an advantage and I could create as many posts as I liked. Because Jeremy Donovan was a coward I came here and practically begged you to let me post to tie up some loose ends from my old SR posting days. You didn't respond and finally I could not take it anymore and posted. I have done my best to discipline myself and you obviously can see that I have indeed improved my 'posting' life. So, I don't see why I do not deserve at least a 5 post a day limit. Is it because I am too smart or too dumb?
You wanna know sumthin? I was going to tell UCLA that an administrator from a message board forum I am posting in seems to think that UCLA would give a Ph. D to Carlos Castaneda even if they suspected that there was no actual don Juan and Castaneda lied and made the whole thing up. If and when they respond I'll be certain to remember to ask them! Personally, I feel that is ridiculous, but...well...who knows! They may be giving Ph. Ds to chimps and gorillas now.
You people seem to think that Richard DeMille's book only hurt Carlos Castaneda. That was NOTHING compared to how Richard DeMille hurt the credibility of UCLA! Yes, the real damage done by DeMille's book was in damaging the reputation of UCLA and making them look like a bunch of bumbling fools who give Ph. Ds to obvious frauds. I believe that by the time DeMille wrote his book against Castaneda Carlos was long gone as a student at UCLA. However, the book most probably got a lot of people asking questions about just how much UCLA should be trusted in determining who does and who does not deserve a Ph. D from the experts of UCLA. I mean, if they are such bumbling fool idiots that they didn't even know Carlos Castaneda was sitting in the UCLA library when he was supposedly taking peyote with don Juan...well...that is incredibly damaging to the reputation of UCLA. You'd better believe it is!!!!
I intend to push this matter with UCLA until I get a response. If I get no response I'm going to call them and do my best to get a direct email address to the UCLA administration. THEY are the ones to settle this matter and I strongly doubt they are going to say their experts were actually bumbling idiots and gave a Ph. D to an obvious fraud. Who knows? Maybe they will say they were idiots! We'll see, eh?
Whether or not they say Carlos Castaneda deserved his Ph. D has NO BEARING WHATSOEVER on the quality of the lessons of don Juan. Get it?
Those lessons can stand on their own, get it?
Most of the lessons of don Juan are RIGHT ON, from my empirical testing with Mother Nature. Some of the lessons of don Juan are extremely dangerous and should not be applied by the sane who want to live a wonderful life. That's my personal evaluation and I'm certain the truly wise who have tested those lessons, like Victor Sanchez, will indeed agree with me.
I've come to the conclusion that the entire Sustained Action site, including the Sustained Reaction message board forum, was created on the premise that Richard DeMille's book, about Carlos Castaneda, was the equivalent of 'Gospel Truth'. Yes, I now feel that it was the belief in the infallible credibility of Richard DeMille that led to the creation of the whole Sustained Action and Reaction sites. So, all I have to do is take apart the credibility of Richard DeMille and I will tear the foundational premise of this forum apart by its proverbial seams!
That is what I currently believe and that is why I wrote UCLA the email I have shared here.
From my studies, the credibility of Richard DeMille has already been damaged by his own **** blundering. He had to create an updated version of his book apologizing for his INCORRECT statement concerning mushrooms growing in the Sonora desert. I have little doubt that before DeMille created that apology the knuckleheaded TB idiots just blindly took DeMille at his word. Such are the ways of blind, knuckleheaded TB idiots. They tend to blindly believe, like the idiots they truly are. Corey and Jeremy Donovan OBVIOUSLY went from being Castaneda TB idiots to Richard DeMille TB idiots without hardly skipping a proverbial beat.
_______________________________________
TOM WROTE:
"Tell us, Solecat. How have you changed your behavior to improve your life?"
MY RESPONSE:
Wanting an answer to that question has got to be the most important thing anyone can currently ask in this forum, right Tom?
Well, everyone here knows I can indeed answer this question, about myself, with proof that I have improved my life by curtailing my vile insults in this forum. I feel that you were so impressed that, instead of just one-post per day, you gave me three-posts a day. However, I am curious: Do others here deserve the right to create more than three-posts a day because you feel they are wiser than I am? Or is it because you feel they are dumber than YOU are and you enjoy looking down on them and secretly laughing to yourself?
Does Coconuts deserve the right to create as many YouTube link posts as he likes because he is wiser than I am? Really??
Once you gave me the option to create 3 posts a day Jeremy Donovan ran from the forum like a bat out of a cave with spotlights turned on. He ran back to Greece, with Guy Gardner, and obviously intends to stay there. You see, Jeremy was only comfortable responding to me as long as he had the advantage to create as many posts as he liked and I was limited to one-post a day. People like Jeremy are only comfortable when they can debate with an unfair advantage. On a level playing field people like Jeremy Donovan run like cowards. If this were not so I would have debated him in a neutral forum where neither of us had an advantage and I could create as many posts as I liked. Because Jeremy Donovan was a coward I came here and practically begged you to let me post to tie up some loose ends from my old SR posting days. You didn't respond and finally I could not take it anymore and posted. I have done my best to discipline myself and you obviously can see that I have indeed improved my 'posting' life. So, I don't see why I do not deserve at least a 5 post a day limit. Is it because I am too smart or too dumb?
You wanna know sumthin? I was going to tell UCLA that an administrator from a message board forum I am posting in seems to think that UCLA would give a Ph. D to Carlos Castaneda even if they suspected that there was no actual don Juan and Castaneda lied and made the whole thing up. If and when they respond I'll be certain to remember to ask them! Personally, I feel that is ridiculous, but...well...who knows! They may be giving Ph. Ds to chimps and gorillas now.
You people seem to think that Richard DeMille's book only hurt Carlos Castaneda. That was NOTHING compared to how Richard DeMille hurt the credibility of UCLA! Yes, the real damage done by DeMille's book was in damaging the reputation of UCLA and making them look like a bunch of bumbling fools who give Ph. Ds to obvious frauds. I believe that by the time DeMille wrote his book against Castaneda Carlos was long gone as a student at UCLA. However, the book most probably got a lot of people asking questions about just how much UCLA should be trusted in determining who does and who does not deserve a Ph. D from the experts of UCLA. I mean, if they are such bumbling fool idiots that they didn't even know Carlos Castaneda was sitting in the UCLA library when he was supposedly taking peyote with don Juan...well...that is incredibly damaging to the reputation of UCLA. You'd better believe it is!!!!
I intend to push this matter with UCLA until I get a response. If I get no response I'm going to call them and do my best to get a direct email address to the UCLA administration. THEY are the ones to settle this matter and I strongly doubt they are going to say their experts were actually bumbling idiots and gave a Ph. D to an obvious fraud. Who knows? Maybe they will say they were idiots! We'll see, eh?
Whether or not they say Carlos Castaneda deserved his Ph. D has NO BEARING WHATSOEVER on the quality of the lessons of don Juan. Get it?
Those lessons can stand on their own, get it?
Most of the lessons of don Juan are RIGHT ON, from my empirical testing with Mother Nature. Some of the lessons of don Juan are extremely dangerous and should not be applied by the sane who want to live a wonderful life. That's my personal evaluation and I'm certain the truly wise who have tested those lessons, like Victor Sanchez, will indeed agree with me.