03-03-2011, 12:00 AM
And under what criteria would you yourself believe such a person? NL
Remember I seemed to be the only one who did not have a problem when LW publicly announced that he had burned from within. That people seemed to have a double standard when considering LW and myself seems to go unnoticed or is just too inconvenient for some.
Now I can certainly accept such a thing about LW, but that is because I have a different interpretation of what it means. If people are just accepting the outward meaning portrayed by CC, like Epiquin, then you all have a problem with LW saying he burned from within and yet is still here. Yet I do not hear one word questioning LW in this regard. Why is that????
Personally I sincerely look forward to LW responding to this and also to his response to the Rule we were discussing. I gave you my take on it so far. So how about it LW?
Remember I seemed to be the only one who did not have a problem when LW publicly announced that he had burned from within. That people seemed to have a double standard when considering LW and myself seems to go unnoticed or is just too inconvenient for some.
Now I can certainly accept such a thing about LW, but that is because I have a different interpretation of what it means. If people are just accepting the outward meaning portrayed by CC, like Epiquin, then you all have a problem with LW saying he burned from within and yet is still here. Yet I do not hear one word questioning LW in this regard. Why is that????
Personally I sincerely look forward to LW responding to this and also to his response to the Rule we were discussing. I gave you my take on it so far. So how about it LW?