07-11-2010, 12:00 AM
Besides if a "WARRIOR" isnt fighting for the same freedom as other warriors...
then he is not a warrior..
warrior is a spirit.. the collective have a duty to co-habit..
being alone and battling is more apprenticeship.. and more learning!
There are expressive layers to warriorship..
But they are a collective expression..
and yes.. if you are saying you are a warrior.. with whom others dont share..and that your warriorship is about SPIRIT!
Then you are being negative about other peoples spiritual understanding in contrast to your desire to be about war beyond survival!
which without being pedantic about your actual use of words.. is actually a challenging thing to say.. in an arena focused on FREEDOM!
then he is not a warrior..
warrior is a spirit.. the collective have a duty to co-habit..
being alone and battling is more apprenticeship.. and more learning!
There are expressive layers to warriorship..
But they are a collective expression..
and yes.. if you are saying you are a warrior.. with whom others dont share..and that your warriorship is about SPIRIT!
Then you are being negative about other peoples spiritual understanding in contrast to your desire to be about war beyond survival!
which without being pedantic about your actual use of words.. is actually a challenging thing to say.. in an arena focused on FREEDOM!

