08-30-2010, 12:00 AM
Wei Shan Yang wrote:"We addressed this in chat, so no use for repetition here."
Hey its new to some reading these threads.
Gonzo wrote: Regardless of the possibilities, regardless of the forays into whatever attention level by whatever means, we still end up back here. Sorcery is nice, and so are mushrooms, but in the end, we fetch water and carry firewood, believe it or don't.
And what lead man to harness fire and water? Plus, today most turn on their tap for water and switch on their furnace for heat. There's some sorcery for ya.
And if I'm not getting you correctly, please explain what you mean by this. The "in the end, we" part....a figure of speech, essentially...perhaps equivalent to "after all", or maybe "in other words", in this case, the bottom line...that is, regardless of the "trip" and the methodology, it comes round full circle to the starting point in the tonal.
Hey its new to some reading these threads.
Gonzo wrote: Regardless of the possibilities, regardless of the forays into whatever attention level by whatever means, we still end up back here. Sorcery is nice, and so are mushrooms, but in the end, we fetch water and carry firewood, believe it or don't.
And what lead man to harness fire and water? Plus, today most turn on their tap for water and switch on their furnace for heat. There's some sorcery for ya.
And if I'm not getting you correctly, please explain what you mean by this. The "in the end, we" part....a figure of speech, essentially...perhaps equivalent to "after all", or maybe "in other words", in this case, the bottom line...that is, regardless of the "trip" and the methodology, it comes round full circle to the starting point in the tonal.