05-23-2011, 12:01 AM
I had a more lengthy response to my withdrawing from Ravenfiled/DD, but this will probably suffice.
When I started reading what was posted there especially by you LW, I could not align. What you have outlined, the framework, so to speak is too “cookie cutter” for me. I think it is the responsibility of each new “era” of seers to wrestle with the designs of intent in order to fathom what is being indicated, what direction to move in, how to proceed, how to express and embody the inexpressible. We cannot put “new wine into old wine skins”.
I know earlier I was pressing about the Rule and nagual parties etc. I was trying to open a dialogue on the matter. I am far from adopting a literal interpretation of the Rule as expressed in Eagle’s Gift. It is not that I am against such an approach, such an approach might even be fruitful. The approach of generations past regarding the Rule expressed in CC’s works, is the fruit of “their” labor the expression of their wrestling with the designs of intent.
I find that those expressions of the eras of old and new seers and too 2nd attention ladened. The orientation and interpretation too burdened with dead ends.
This thread “Sorcerer’s Explanation Reviewed”, is the expression of my wrestling with the design’s of intent and the impact it had upon Don Juan’s life (not easy to get to). It has taken me a long time to even scratch the surface here, regarding, this era of the “Modern seers”. I confused the modern seers as new seers of this time. Nemo helped clarify that for me so I am now able to approach the implications of the “modern seers” and assess more accurately the conclusions of the new seers.
This thread represents the liminality of this process. There was such a lack of participation in this thread by the “sorcerer’s” of this forum. Regardless of what some might think of me, I urge you to put aside any personal feelings good or bad toward me and engage the content of this thread and let us hear from you.What do you think about the direction DJ appears to be advocating?
When I started reading what was posted there especially by you LW, I could not align. What you have outlined, the framework, so to speak is too “cookie cutter” for me. I think it is the responsibility of each new “era” of seers to wrestle with the designs of intent in order to fathom what is being indicated, what direction to move in, how to proceed, how to express and embody the inexpressible. We cannot put “new wine into old wine skins”.
I know earlier I was pressing about the Rule and nagual parties etc. I was trying to open a dialogue on the matter. I am far from adopting a literal interpretation of the Rule as expressed in Eagle’s Gift. It is not that I am against such an approach, such an approach might even be fruitful. The approach of generations past regarding the Rule expressed in CC’s works, is the fruit of “their” labor the expression of their wrestling with the designs of intent.
I find that those expressions of the eras of old and new seers and too 2nd attention ladened. The orientation and interpretation too burdened with dead ends.
This thread “Sorcerer’s Explanation Reviewed”, is the expression of my wrestling with the design’s of intent and the impact it had upon Don Juan’s life (not easy to get to). It has taken me a long time to even scratch the surface here, regarding, this era of the “Modern seers”. I confused the modern seers as new seers of this time. Nemo helped clarify that for me so I am now able to approach the implications of the “modern seers” and assess more accurately the conclusions of the new seers.
This thread represents the liminality of this process. There was such a lack of participation in this thread by the “sorcerer’s” of this forum. Regardless of what some might think of me, I urge you to put aside any personal feelings good or bad toward me and engage the content of this thread and let us hear from you.What do you think about the direction DJ appears to be advocating?