05-30-2011, 12:01 AM
The other private forum he mentions is "DD" which stands for death
defiers which is entirely based on Nagualism and the seeing of the
Modern Seers (Eagles Rule). LW
LW Could you please expound on this, especially how you link the "modern seers" to the Rule? I believe what I have been showing in this thread is how the modern seers represent the possibility of achieving what new seers could not, though new seers knew of it, as we know by what DJ said of his benefactor and teacher. Those powerful men did not get it. So what is so different about what DJ is advocating, see? And how did he come upon it? That is what I am trying to point out here. That is what this thread has been about.
Your point of view here is vital if you continue to be willing to express it like this. It represents the position of one side of the threshold. Without its clear representation juxtaposed to what is one the other side of the threshold the point of demarcation is harder to see. I have been bringing the threshold itself forward. When we see that what the new seers represent and what the modern seers represent are not the same then we are in a position to really explore the implications involved and what this might mean as we press forward. This must have been what it was like when the new seers forged a new path from the old seers. What is surprising as it must have also been for the new seers way back when they started, is that the Eagle would just "move in a new direction" and it is up to us to discern the design of intent. This I believe is how we do it.
defiers which is entirely based on Nagualism and the seeing of the
Modern Seers (Eagles Rule). LW
LW Could you please expound on this, especially how you link the "modern seers" to the Rule? I believe what I have been showing in this thread is how the modern seers represent the possibility of achieving what new seers could not, though new seers knew of it, as we know by what DJ said of his benefactor and teacher. Those powerful men did not get it. So what is so different about what DJ is advocating, see? And how did he come upon it? That is what I am trying to point out here. That is what this thread has been about.
Your point of view here is vital if you continue to be willing to express it like this. It represents the position of one side of the threshold. Without its clear representation juxtaposed to what is one the other side of the threshold the point of demarcation is harder to see. I have been bringing the threshold itself forward. When we see that what the new seers represent and what the modern seers represent are not the same then we are in a position to really explore the implications involved and what this might mean as we press forward. This must have been what it was like when the new seers forged a new path from the old seers. What is surprising as it must have also been for the new seers way back when they started, is that the Eagle would just "move in a new direction" and it is up to us to discern the design of intent. This I believe is how we do it.