04-15-2013, 12:04 AM
Point taken.
Imo the reviewer is overly identified on account of the emotiveness of his attack on Patterson. So he looses credibility and comes across as just another CC defender. On the other hand I was disappointed in Pattersons book, which focused too much on gossip and not at all on his own 'seeing'. His own seeing is what I wanted to read about.
I have only read the introduction to Belzebub Tales.
Imo the reviewer is overly identified on account of the emotiveness of his attack on Patterson. So he looses credibility and comes across as just another CC defender. On the other hand I was disappointed in Pattersons book, which focused too much on gossip and not at all on his own 'seeing'. His own seeing is what I wanted to read about.
I have only read the introduction to Belzebub Tales.