11-28-2011, 12:01 AM
Ravenmoon wrote
iamond Unicorn wrote:
A follower of the teachings can consider it as an exercise in the 'art of stalking' or 'controlled folly'.
This is an interesting comment DU. The last sentence gives it a complexity, a paradox of sorts.
Were you aware of this when you wrote it? Or is it as Bob Ross says "a happy little accident"?
Yeah, whoa! I an barely wrap my head around that. Followers of books and teachings that were lies can look at the lies themselves as examples of the lies they sold as teachings? Yeesh!
In other words, if the books were lies, and the teachings, then how could the art of stalking or controlled folly be real practices? Hmmmmm
iamond Unicorn wrote:A follower of the teachings can consider it as an exercise in the 'art of stalking' or 'controlled folly'.
This is an interesting comment DU. The last sentence gives it a complexity, a paradox of sorts.
Were you aware of this when you wrote it? Or is it as Bob Ross says "a happy little accident"?
Yeah, whoa! I an barely wrap my head around that. Followers of books and teachings that were lies can look at the lies themselves as examples of the lies they sold as teachings? Yeesh!
In other words, if the books were lies, and the teachings, then how could the art of stalking or controlled folly be real practices? Hmmmmm