08-03-2017, 12:00 AM
Serloco, yeah, I imagine being able to see the thoughts of another to be quite an experience xP the way you phrase that concept makes it sound all magical when it's quite scientific too. You know, when it comes to language receptive language is always the first to form and then expressive language develops. We always know more (receptive to more) than we're able to express. I imagine the next step to receptive telepathy that you mentioned, is to figure out how to be more expressive. Lol and what you were thinking was that you probably opened the washing machine prematurely. . . best to let things finish inside the machine instead of interrupting the process. xP
JJ, words are useful in that they are the bridge between human consciousness and collective consciousness. Words facilitate feedback--and as telepathy is developed feedback is necessary. It's one reason why we share our dreams with others.... to gain feedback to tweak the telepathic process. Words are necessary when developing telepathy.
Watergaze, lol yeah sometimes there is no point...just a dance between minds for the sake of an experience. A hope of tripping over an epiphany. What you mention about communication styles of online vs in-person are understandable. Everyone prefers one over another--and makes use of anything reasonable lol. For the most part, I like forums because I don't have to wait for a response that I do in live-chats. For me, it's more efficient and effective to use forums than chat as there's no waiting and I can move as fast as my own intellect processes ideas. This is important for me because it doesn't take a long time to formulate responses. Some might say I might have more quality responses if I took more time to formulate responses but that's not true. My quality level is pretty consistent regardless of timeliness. Any quality post I make takes the same degree of consideration as my ridiculous posts. Sometimes my ridiculous postings take MORE time than my better posts. Hell, and it's when I'm pissed when I'm most efficient lol. I text and type so much faster and with such a greater degree of clarity that I've considered ONLY communicating when I'm pissed. xD There are benefits to each style of communication
Context plays a big part.
My high standards are a complicated thing. I don't limit myself to the style of communication--I can manage with a wide range of style. What is limiting is my demand for people to have or develop a fortified sense of integrity. Now integrity can mean different things to different people. How that's expressed can also muddy up the interpretation. All I mean is I want to see that people have met their I AM (or gaining progress in making that introduction) and that sort of measurement can be witnessed by their interactions and development of adaptation to change. That's a tall order to ask of others, I'm aware. Though, I don't want to be around people who aren't fluid because the transitions are very bumpy and awkward and that generally provokes tension in me if I'm around it long enough. That's also a sensitivity of mine--being around rigid people because I eventually begin to feel it. Do I avoid rigid people? No. Do I limit my time around them? Yes. Am I rigid? In select ways. I think rigid thinking is due to self-preservation. An attempt to limit the degree of dissonance we allow ourselves to experience. So long as we're gently coaxing ourselves into a less degree of rigidity then we're doing ourselves a service by addressing our limitations.
You've told me I'm too serious (over-complicate things) before; are you saying you're a cucumber? Cucumbers are mostly water so I see the relevance, but I don't think that's what you meant.
Words are necessary for this age of humanity. Words bridge individual consciousness and allow interaction. Words are limiting as there are some emotions that cannot be put into words, but can be shared non-verbally (like sipping coffee with someone adored, words can't fully encompass that emotion or feeling of completeness). When someone says "I love you" that can have many different variations of intent behind it. Words are a generalization of intent and it's more precise to use telepathy rather than words. It's like reading between the lines. There are no words between the lines, but there is an energetic undercurrent there to be perceived. Though it is very subtle.
I'm sure it seems easy to ask for clear communication, but sometimes it's not as easy as you think. Common sense is not so common Everyone has a different background and so for me, someone who has worked in law enforcement, I'm highly attuned to behavior that needs to be addressed prior to it becoming an issue. I see posturing and threatening behavior in group settings long before anyone throws a punch. I've seen patterns of violence that make me highly sensitive to these types of situations. Hence, when I say something needs to be addressed it is based on my knowledge and experience. There's a reason behind it and that's generally to de-escalate a potential situation. Now, I may not fully communicate my rational because to me it all has clarity and I wonder how another can't see it with such clarity. That's one example of why communication may be clouded.
For someone who is entirely nonviolent, they would not see what I see. This is a difference of perception. For someone from a tolerant and human-conscious country, raised by an intelligent non-violent family, surrounded by people who are educated and nonviolent, that type of individual wouldn't notice scenarios escalating toward violent behavior because they lack enough exposure to identify certain APs.
Someone who has grown up in "the hood" will have developed a sensitivity for being scammed. Someone who has grown up religious will have developed a sensitivity for the abstract and faith. Someone who has suffered parental abuse (violence) will have developed a sensitivity for anger. People who have taken on the AP of these individuals can also acquire a sensitivity for these things as well. The greater number of APs we can take on, the greater our sensitivity overall. When we tell someone to "open their eyes" we're asking them to see things from a different perspective. Not to accept the perspective, but to understand the perspective. Hence, things are not common sense because people haven't learned a particular AP in those situations.
So when you ask why can't people just ask for what they want.... the explanation is really more along the lines of why haven't you held their AP? If communication is inefficient it's an issue between all parties, not one party. Sometimes we just can't see another AP and asking others to be better is silly. The issue isn't with others, it's with the self. Instead of saying things are easier if people tell me what they want, it's actually easier if I would expand my perception (it's easier to go to people than it is to expect them to come to us).
JJ, words are useful in that they are the bridge between human consciousness and collective consciousness. Words facilitate feedback--and as telepathy is developed feedback is necessary. It's one reason why we share our dreams with others.... to gain feedback to tweak the telepathic process. Words are necessary when developing telepathy.
Watergaze, lol yeah sometimes there is no point...just a dance between minds for the sake of an experience. A hope of tripping over an epiphany. What you mention about communication styles of online vs in-person are understandable. Everyone prefers one over another--and makes use of anything reasonable lol. For the most part, I like forums because I don't have to wait for a response that I do in live-chats. For me, it's more efficient and effective to use forums than chat as there's no waiting and I can move as fast as my own intellect processes ideas. This is important for me because it doesn't take a long time to formulate responses. Some might say I might have more quality responses if I took more time to formulate responses but that's not true. My quality level is pretty consistent regardless of timeliness. Any quality post I make takes the same degree of consideration as my ridiculous posts. Sometimes my ridiculous postings take MORE time than my better posts. Hell, and it's when I'm pissed when I'm most efficient lol. I text and type so much faster and with such a greater degree of clarity that I've considered ONLY communicating when I'm pissed. xD There are benefits to each style of communication
Context plays a big part.My high standards are a complicated thing. I don't limit myself to the style of communication--I can manage with a wide range of style. What is limiting is my demand for people to have or develop a fortified sense of integrity. Now integrity can mean different things to different people. How that's expressed can also muddy up the interpretation. All I mean is I want to see that people have met their I AM (or gaining progress in making that introduction) and that sort of measurement can be witnessed by their interactions and development of adaptation to change. That's a tall order to ask of others, I'm aware. Though, I don't want to be around people who aren't fluid because the transitions are very bumpy and awkward and that generally provokes tension in me if I'm around it long enough. That's also a sensitivity of mine--being around rigid people because I eventually begin to feel it. Do I avoid rigid people? No. Do I limit my time around them? Yes. Am I rigid? In select ways. I think rigid thinking is due to self-preservation. An attempt to limit the degree of dissonance we allow ourselves to experience. So long as we're gently coaxing ourselves into a less degree of rigidity then we're doing ourselves a service by addressing our limitations.
You've told me I'm too serious (over-complicate things) before; are you saying you're a cucumber? Cucumbers are mostly water so I see the relevance, but I don't think that's what you meant.
Words are necessary for this age of humanity. Words bridge individual consciousness and allow interaction. Words are limiting as there are some emotions that cannot be put into words, but can be shared non-verbally (like sipping coffee with someone adored, words can't fully encompass that emotion or feeling of completeness). When someone says "I love you" that can have many different variations of intent behind it. Words are a generalization of intent and it's more precise to use telepathy rather than words. It's like reading between the lines. There are no words between the lines, but there is an energetic undercurrent there to be perceived. Though it is very subtle.
I'm sure it seems easy to ask for clear communication, but sometimes it's not as easy as you think. Common sense is not so common
Everyone has a different background and so for me, someone who has worked in law enforcement, I'm highly attuned to behavior that needs to be addressed prior to it becoming an issue. I see posturing and threatening behavior in group settings long before anyone throws a punch. I've seen patterns of violence that make me highly sensitive to these types of situations. Hence, when I say something needs to be addressed it is based on my knowledge and experience. There's a reason behind it and that's generally to de-escalate a potential situation. Now, I may not fully communicate my rational because to me it all has clarity and I wonder how another can't see it with such clarity. That's one example of why communication may be clouded.For someone who is entirely nonviolent, they would not see what I see. This is a difference of perception. For someone from a tolerant and human-conscious country, raised by an intelligent non-violent family, surrounded by people who are educated and nonviolent, that type of individual wouldn't notice scenarios escalating toward violent behavior because they lack enough exposure to identify certain APs.
Someone who has grown up in "the hood" will have developed a sensitivity for being scammed. Someone who has grown up religious will have developed a sensitivity for the abstract and faith. Someone who has suffered parental abuse (violence) will have developed a sensitivity for anger. People who have taken on the AP of these individuals can also acquire a sensitivity for these things as well. The greater number of APs we can take on, the greater our sensitivity overall. When we tell someone to "open their eyes" we're asking them to see things from a different perspective. Not to accept the perspective, but to understand the perspective. Hence, things are not common sense because people haven't learned a particular AP in those situations.
So when you ask why can't people just ask for what they want.... the explanation is really more along the lines of why haven't you held their AP? If communication is inefficient it's an issue between all parties, not one party. Sometimes we just can't see another AP and asking others to be better is silly. The issue isn't with others, it's with the self. Instead of saying things are easier if people tell me what they want, it's actually easier if I would expand my perception (it's easier to go to people than it is to expect them to come to us).