05-16-2017, 12:00 AM
If I can still hang with Germany and Hitler in my dreams, I see no reason why you can't hang with Miley. Intelligence has no skin color.
As for the shifts, fluidity has enough space to accommodate ego and pride. Although, maybe I'm just being silly here. Consider this: those with true command over their consciousness have no limits. If there are no limits, couldn't there be a moment in time when an aware individual selects ego, nationalism, or pride? If those concepts (social conditioning) serve the objective, then avoiding embracing those would result in failure.
Delhi probably could be the third eye and Australia the massive dick of the planet. What harm is there to be have an ego? I know Carlos aims to move beyond these things to eliminate them, but Carlos seems to have missed a detail or two. Once a person moves beyond a trait, why not turn around and use that trait in appropriate situations? Perhaps the point isn't to eliminate, but control. If we eliminated all of these "lesser" traits of self, I'm unconvinced that's a desired global outcome. Now, control over the lesser traits seems far more useful. To simplify myself: I would rather have lots of options than to permanently eliminate all (or most) of my options. That's just me though, everyone lives their own beliefs. I know DokGreen preferred total elimination over control. To each their own. Do you prefer control or elimination, Rosy?
As for the shifts, fluidity has enough space to accommodate ego and pride. Although, maybe I'm just being silly here. Consider this: those with true command over their consciousness have no limits. If there are no limits, couldn't there be a moment in time when an aware individual selects ego, nationalism, or pride? If those concepts (social conditioning) serve the objective, then avoiding embracing those would result in failure.
Delhi probably could be the third eye and Australia the massive dick of the planet. What harm is there to be have an ego? I know Carlos aims to move beyond these things to eliminate them, but Carlos seems to have missed a detail or two. Once a person moves beyond a trait, why not turn around and use that trait in appropriate situations? Perhaps the point isn't to eliminate, but control. If we eliminated all of these "lesser" traits of self, I'm unconvinced that's a desired global outcome. Now, control over the lesser traits seems far more useful. To simplify myself: I would rather have lots of options than to permanently eliminate all (or most) of my options. That's just me though, everyone lives their own beliefs. I know DokGreen preferred total elimination over control. To each their own. Do you prefer control or elimination, Rosy?