05-20-2017, 12:00 AM
Kao13 wrote:rosygyro wrote:Kao13 wrote:What's fucked up about trying to channel the dead? Are we not all dead? I may sit here and type, share my consciousness, but what if we are mere after-thoughts of what is now a dead body? How do we not know that the dead thing we are channeling, is ourselves . . .
What if we (humanity) are already dead and we are the past energetic residue left over by our future bodies. We have the now, to change the course of what will be. If this fucked up channeling into our past, to alter our future, is truly fucked. . . I would make the attempt anyway. What's left to lose if we've already lost?
channelling the dead is so f---kin dumb..
and if you live in that world and end up
being eaten up by it , it is your own fault.Would you still be so heartless if I died while channeling the dead to save your life? If you would pity me then assume I would never do you any such favors. If you would appreciate the help, then the reciprocal nature of assistance is typically returned in kind.
But what do I know, I live under the sea.
human death is a part of the HAP. the swathes of already dead only exist because of the course of the HAP.
if we are to change the course of the HAP
it is necissay to cut the ties to the underworld and take major power import
from potential energy of the future.
Those who are drilling the sub corporeal for power of the dead
are doing so from within the corporeal
and in so doing reaffirming and reinforcing the direction of the HAP.
you do realise that patriarchy exists/perpetuates because of the attatchemnt to
the dead subcorporeal portion of a families male line?
just i thought this was about feminism.
(conversely the female (if your even interested)
can access aspects of the subcorporeal without using the dead
as her ovaries contained all the eggs she can ever gestate at birth
her mother were in her body before she was born
her grand mothers before she was et..
meaning the maternal line can be tracked internally
without any need for the family being attatched to the sub corporeal.
but you go ahead and argue.
What if we (humanity) are already dead and we are the past energetic residue left over by our future bodies. We have the now, to change the course of what will be. If this fucked up channeling into our past, to alter our future, is truly fucked. . . I would make the attempt anyway. What's left to lose if we've already lost?
channelling the dead is so f---kin dumb..
and if you live in that world and end up
being eaten up by it , it is your own fault.Would you still be so heartless if I died while channeling the dead to save your life? If you would pity me then assume I would never do you any such favors. If you would appreciate the help, then the reciprocal nature of assistance is typically returned in kind.
But what do I know, I live under the sea.
human death is a part of the HAP. the swathes of already dead only exist because of the course of the HAP.
if we are to change the course of the HAP
it is necissay to cut the ties to the underworld and take major power import
from potential energy of the future.
Those who are drilling the sub corporeal for power of the dead
are doing so from within the corporeal
and in so doing reaffirming and reinforcing the direction of the HAP.
you do realise that patriarchy exists/perpetuates because of the attatchemnt to
the dead subcorporeal portion of a families male line?
just i thought this was about feminism.
(conversely the female (if your even interested)
can access aspects of the subcorporeal without using the dead
as her ovaries contained all the eggs she can ever gestate at birth
her mother were in her body before she was born
her grand mothers before she was et..
meaning the maternal line can be tracked internally
without any need for the family being attatched to the sub corporeal.
but you go ahead and argue.