05-20-2017, 12:00 AM
rosygyro wrote:Would you still be so heartless if I died while channeling the dead to save your life? If you would pity me then assume I would never do you any such favors. If you would appreciate the help, then the reciprocal nature of assistance is typically returned in kind.
Those who are drilling the sub corporeal for power of the dead
are doing so from within the corporeal
and in so doing reaffirming and reinforcing the direction of the HAP.
Is it not sometimes necessary to turn to the past to reinforce the future?
you do realise that patriarchy exists/perpetuates because of the attatchemnt to
the dead subcorporeal portion of a families male line?
just i thought this was about feminism.
Both patriarchy and matriarchy are perpetuated due to the dead and the living . . . the thread began with a feminist focus, all sons have a mother, sons represent patriarchy--and so patriarchy is directly connected to matriarchy.
(conversely the female (if your even interested)
I'm always interested.
can access aspects of the subcorporeal without using the dead
as her ovaries contained all the eggs she can ever gestate at birth
her mother were in her body before she was born
her grand mothers before she was et..
meaning the maternal line can be tracked internally
without any need for the family being attatched to the sub corporeal.
This is true, but the greater truth is that not only can we connect to the matriarch line, but we can also access the patriarch line. It is two, not one.
but you go ahead and argue.
I'm not arguing, I'm agreeing and disagreeing with you. I'm saying, you are right. Yet, what I'm also saying is there is more than just what you are saying. I'm not arguing, I'm just insulting your idea by implying that it's primitive.
Those who are drilling the sub corporeal for power of the dead
are doing so from within the corporeal
and in so doing reaffirming and reinforcing the direction of the HAP.
Is it not sometimes necessary to turn to the past to reinforce the future?
you do realise that patriarchy exists/perpetuates because of the attatchemnt to
the dead subcorporeal portion of a families male line?
just i thought this was about feminism.
Both patriarchy and matriarchy are perpetuated due to the dead and the living . . . the thread began with a feminist focus, all sons have a mother, sons represent patriarchy--and so patriarchy is directly connected to matriarchy.
(conversely the female (if your even interested)
I'm always interested.
can access aspects of the subcorporeal without using the dead
as her ovaries contained all the eggs she can ever gestate at birth
her mother were in her body before she was born
her grand mothers before she was et..
meaning the maternal line can be tracked internally
without any need for the family being attatched to the sub corporeal.
This is true, but the greater truth is that not only can we connect to the matriarch line, but we can also access the patriarch line. It is two, not one.
but you go ahead and argue.
I'm not arguing, I'm agreeing and disagreeing with you. I'm saying, you are right. Yet, what I'm also saying is there is more than just what you are saying. I'm not arguing, I'm just insulting your idea by implying that it's primitive.