05-21-2017, 12:00 AM
Kao13 wrote:
JJ the issue isn't about gender. The issue is unfair treatment, regardless of gender, income, or belief. If "the issue" you're talking about is feminism then it's very obvious even in the definition you provided earlier, which I pointed out was written by feminists that the issue is about sex. If you want to whine, add in other issues to strengthen your argument. Whether or not mentioning issues is whining is a matter of opinion. It would be nice if those opinions would be soundly based on the nature of the issues themselves, rather than on the gender-exclusive empathy of modern society. As it stands you sound like a misinformed dude angry at vaginas. What mental gymnastics did you go through to reach that conclusion? He doesn't agree with feminists... feminists want to empower women... women have vaginas... thus he's angry at vaginas! Also, calling someone else misinformed without first examining the information they do have is just idiocy. That you read what I've written here and conclude I "sound like a misinformed dude angry at vaginas" says a lot more about your ability or willingness to rationally consider these issues than it does about me. Be a man! Take a stand!I have a male body and was born more than 18 years ago. Thus, I am a man. I can't not be a man, at least not while I'm awake in this world, short of gender re-assignment surgery. But of course that's not what people mean when they say "Be a man!". What they mean is "Follow my rules and base your self-image of yourself as a man on them!". Er, no thanks.
JJ the issue isn't about gender. The issue is unfair treatment, regardless of gender, income, or belief. If "the issue" you're talking about is feminism then it's very obvious even in the definition you provided earlier, which I pointed out was written by feminists that the issue is about sex. If you want to whine, add in other issues to strengthen your argument. Whether or not mentioning issues is whining is a matter of opinion. It would be nice if those opinions would be soundly based on the nature of the issues themselves, rather than on the gender-exclusive empathy of modern society. As it stands you sound like a misinformed dude angry at vaginas. What mental gymnastics did you go through to reach that conclusion? He doesn't agree with feminists... feminists want to empower women... women have vaginas... thus he's angry at vaginas! Also, calling someone else misinformed without first examining the information they do have is just idiocy. That you read what I've written here and conclude I "sound like a misinformed dude angry at vaginas" says a lot more about your ability or willingness to rationally consider these issues than it does about me. Be a man! Take a stand!I have a male body and was born more than 18 years ago. Thus, I am a man. I can't not be a man, at least not while I'm awake in this world, short of gender re-assignment surgery. But of course that's not what people mean when they say "Be a man!". What they mean is "Follow my rules and base your self-image of yourself as a man on them!". Er, no thanks.