04-13-2017, 12:00 AM
It is very beneficial to observe (stalk) the nature and specifics of interactions with others.
To comment more specifically on what you write I'd need more context. For example, I noticed in general that being on the path does not mean we have more options, actually the path narrows - like you mention but I am not sure you mean it here in the same way as I do . The narrowing of the path in the sense that I mean is a pretty interesting phenomenon and it is not negative.
Concerning disliking a person for certain actions.... Leaving things open and free from judgement is freeing. Decisions come from other places then... one is more open to spirit.
Erasing personal history does not mean one has nothing to say about one's past - imo. The having released one's past is not related to not talking or sharing. It is somewhere else - a different layer. One can share stories of one's past just like one can share stories of a movie one watched last night .
You know that apathy and inaction are not specifically the desired result or aim, hence you are moving in a good direction in that sense. We are here in this world for a reason. If one is in apathy and inaction then stuff passes us by. And it is no fun .
What is this difference between what you have viewed and what you have seen? I am asking about your use of these two phrases.
It is so interesting to observe the dynamics of conversation. In order to bring certain ideas or comments there needs to be something there that can receive them or work with them. The setting, the mood, the awareness. You can try to bring this setting about of course or just wait for it if there is a chance of it happening on its own.
And also I find very interesting to note the point after which talking does not make sense any more. This is something I have been observing for some time in the past .
To comment more specifically on what you write I'd need more context. For example, I noticed in general that being on the path does not mean we have more options, actually the path narrows - like you mention but I am not sure you mean it here in the same way as I do . The narrowing of the path in the sense that I mean is a pretty interesting phenomenon and it is not negative.
Concerning disliking a person for certain actions.... Leaving things open and free from judgement is freeing. Decisions come from other places then... one is more open to spirit.
Erasing personal history does not mean one has nothing to say about one's past - imo. The having released one's past is not related to not talking or sharing. It is somewhere else - a different layer. One can share stories of one's past just like one can share stories of a movie one watched last night .
You know that apathy and inaction are not specifically the desired result or aim, hence you are moving in a good direction in that sense. We are here in this world for a reason. If one is in apathy and inaction then stuff passes us by. And it is no fun .
What is this difference between what you have viewed and what you have seen? I am asking about your use of these two phrases.
It is so interesting to observe the dynamics of conversation. In order to bring certain ideas or comments there needs to be something there that can receive them or work with them. The setting, the mood, the awareness. You can try to bring this setting about of course or just wait for it if there is a chance of it happening on its own.
And also I find very interesting to note the point after which talking does not make sense any more. This is something I have been observing for some time in the past .