12-11-2013, 12:00 AM
the universe being pure intelligence and absolute, is the subjective perception that actually creates the illusion of that man made concept of 'ego'...if you didn't 'know' it was so...you couldn't cling to that idea of 'self',
to aspire beyond ourselves, is to drop the absolute fixing, of what we state is the case.however that doesn't happen externally, thats just a pure projection, reflection of what we assume we know..
would it matter whether the universe was 'pure intelligence'....(what is that anyway)...or not.?
as above, so below, fixing ones ideas about the universe, fixes ideas about the self..
to suggest it is 'intelligence', suggests 'design', suggests 'slavery', suggests 'conflict' within and without, constantly renewed by the cycle of using one belief, made manifest.
as an alternative, maybe the universe is just energy, potential electromagnetic presence that has no design, but is there as a commodity...not 'perfect', no 'design', not 'imperfect', no 'contradiction', no 'intelligence'.
you say, 'to transcend ones own nature'...maybe its to transcend into nature, whether you decide to own that, as a design, or allow it, as that was all, it ever was...is the range of potential subjective perception you are entitled to..yet not fixed, by 'design', to be ruled by...
humanity is not ego bound, you project that it is ego bound, reinforcing that belief into your world view. so it indeed reflects to you that bubble, you are determined to perceive, your intent and 'intelligence' strives to convince you, you are safe in your assumptions, giving you, a sense of self.
wouldn't a design of self, be self important?
it is this sense, that tells you, you are 'perfect in your imperfection'...to state 'our' here was a projection, a belief, a sense of self design, laid upon whats actually available.....your safety blanket, of the theory, of your mind...
there is no 'ultimately', a statement of your fixed self state.....there is no perfection, neither is their imperfection, there is no, one world view, neither is their meant to be, 'over unity' between facets..
no design of the 'one'.
sure, we are all energy..but that doesn't not lead to the necessity of commonality.
red is not blue, and never will be, the fact that blue isn't blue and red isn't red..isn't a fault, of design or intelligence, but deeper connection to the underpinning diversity and range of the kaleidoscope here...
So i ask, what is underlying, that concept of design...would it worry you, that it was everything but design?
could you now perceive, that the concept of ego, could be everything but ego?
How would this alter your world view and sense of self, if they were everything but?
turning everything inside out, brings about perception change, if you are truly with the nature of things..which could be either, or something else.... if the nature of things is that fluid...if it is, just the way, it could ever possibly be perceived...then no layers of 'design' or 'intelligence' is required for it to still function...with or without 'you', having a sense of you.
after all it existed before your form was present and it will exist long after your form has disappeared.
it supports your existence, as it supports all existence here...it has no bias to choose one life form over another...it just supports its own nature. which is a potential commodity, not a slave to any 'one' design..it supports freedom, which is potentially what we could identify as the 'self'....
to aspire beyond ourselves, is to drop the absolute fixing, of what we state is the case.however that doesn't happen externally, thats just a pure projection, reflection of what we assume we know..
would it matter whether the universe was 'pure intelligence'....(what is that anyway)...or not.?
as above, so below, fixing ones ideas about the universe, fixes ideas about the self..
to suggest it is 'intelligence', suggests 'design', suggests 'slavery', suggests 'conflict' within and without, constantly renewed by the cycle of using one belief, made manifest.
as an alternative, maybe the universe is just energy, potential electromagnetic presence that has no design, but is there as a commodity...not 'perfect', no 'design', not 'imperfect', no 'contradiction', no 'intelligence'.
you say, 'to transcend ones own nature'...maybe its to transcend into nature, whether you decide to own that, as a design, or allow it, as that was all, it ever was...is the range of potential subjective perception you are entitled to..yet not fixed, by 'design', to be ruled by...
humanity is not ego bound, you project that it is ego bound, reinforcing that belief into your world view. so it indeed reflects to you that bubble, you are determined to perceive, your intent and 'intelligence' strives to convince you, you are safe in your assumptions, giving you, a sense of self.
wouldn't a design of self, be self important?
it is this sense, that tells you, you are 'perfect in your imperfection'...to state 'our' here was a projection, a belief, a sense of self design, laid upon whats actually available.....your safety blanket, of the theory, of your mind...
there is no 'ultimately', a statement of your fixed self state.....there is no perfection, neither is their imperfection, there is no, one world view, neither is their meant to be, 'over unity' between facets..
no design of the 'one'.
sure, we are all energy..but that doesn't not lead to the necessity of commonality.
red is not blue, and never will be, the fact that blue isn't blue and red isn't red..isn't a fault, of design or intelligence, but deeper connection to the underpinning diversity and range of the kaleidoscope here...
So i ask, what is underlying, that concept of design...would it worry you, that it was everything but design?
could you now perceive, that the concept of ego, could be everything but ego?
How would this alter your world view and sense of self, if they were everything but?
turning everything inside out, brings about perception change, if you are truly with the nature of things..which could be either, or something else.... if the nature of things is that fluid...if it is, just the way, it could ever possibly be perceived...then no layers of 'design' or 'intelligence' is required for it to still function...with or without 'you', having a sense of you.
after all it existed before your form was present and it will exist long after your form has disappeared.
it supports your existence, as it supports all existence here...it has no bias to choose one life form over another...it just supports its own nature. which is a potential commodity, not a slave to any 'one' design..it supports freedom, which is potentially what we could identify as the 'self'....