04-07-2011, 12:02 AM
Sedna wrote:
Thanks.
But again there is no example of stalking given...just saying.
You were given plenty, on numerous occasions. Now it's your turn.
Regarding helping another see, or saying that what they are doing really means xyz...who decides it means xyz? You, the stalker? Self-importance...playing god assuming to know what is and what isn't?
No one can help a person who has brains like a box of rocks to 'see.'
Perception is always false and is always the fault of the perciever. What you saw as a child and thought meant one thing you later see as an adult and think it means something else. This is still true...what you see today and interpret in the way you interpret today seen twenty years from now you will surely interpret in another way. Does your perception/interpretation have any innate value to another? This is what is not clear and no one has offered any examples to back up the premise that it does.
Oh Great Nagual woman, is that so? How I see as a child will be different as how I see as an adult?
Regarding where it came from...it did not come from any of the authors, but instead it came from a small group's skewed interpretation of Castaneda and has since become the agreement that it really is a true technique that all would use if they were real warriors. Imho, however, the issue of the absence of direct examples of it being of any practical use is telling enough to dismiss it as fantasy of ego perpetrated to elevate one's self over another.
Tables are turned. It is your turn to try to give an example of stalking. Your turn. No more games can be played. it's over.
Thanks.
But again there is no example of stalking given...just saying.
You were given plenty, on numerous occasions. Now it's your turn.
Regarding helping another see, or saying that what they are doing really means xyz...who decides it means xyz? You, the stalker? Self-importance...playing god assuming to know what is and what isn't?
No one can help a person who has brains like a box of rocks to 'see.'
Perception is always false and is always the fault of the perciever. What you saw as a child and thought meant one thing you later see as an adult and think it means something else. This is still true...what you see today and interpret in the way you interpret today seen twenty years from now you will surely interpret in another way. Does your perception/interpretation have any innate value to another? This is what is not clear and no one has offered any examples to back up the premise that it does.
Oh Great Nagual woman, is that so? How I see as a child will be different as how I see as an adult?
Regarding where it came from...it did not come from any of the authors, but instead it came from a small group's skewed interpretation of Castaneda and has since become the agreement that it really is a true technique that all would use if they were real warriors. Imho, however, the issue of the absence of direct examples of it being of any practical use is telling enough to dismiss it as fantasy of ego perpetrated to elevate one's self over another.
Tables are turned. It is your turn to try to give an example of stalking. Your turn. No more games can be played. it's over.