04-30-2012, 12:00 AM
Urantia:
"Increasingly throughout the morontia progression the assurance of truth replaces the assurance of faith. When you are finally mustered into the actual spirit world, then will the assurances of pure spirit insight operate in the place of faith and truth or, rather, in conjunction with, and superimposed upon, these former techniques of personality assurance."
There is no need to reject 'faith' and 'belief' as having no value; 'pure spirit insight' and 'truth' is built upon them, there is no need to wholly reject the foundation once one further evolves/experiences life (spirit reality).
QS reminds me of one who grows out of their training wheels and onto a regular bicycle but then proceeds to campaign against training wheels preaching that people should just ride regular bicycles and never use training wheels because they are completely useless and without function.
Also one can claim to have 'knowledge' through experience of something, but this does not guarentee the accuracy of such 'knowledge'. One can have an experience but interpret it erroneously thus gaining a false knowledge.
Does 'seeing' make one infallible?
"Increasingly throughout the morontia progression the assurance of truth replaces the assurance of faith. When you are finally mustered into the actual spirit world, then will the assurances of pure spirit insight operate in the place of faith and truth or, rather, in conjunction with, and superimposed upon, these former techniques of personality assurance."
There is no need to reject 'faith' and 'belief' as having no value; 'pure spirit insight' and 'truth' is built upon them, there is no need to wholly reject the foundation once one further evolves/experiences life (spirit reality).
QS reminds me of one who grows out of their training wheels and onto a regular bicycle but then proceeds to campaign against training wheels preaching that people should just ride regular bicycles and never use training wheels because they are completely useless and without function.
Also one can claim to have 'knowledge' through experience of something, but this does not guarentee the accuracy of such 'knowledge'. One can have an experience but interpret it erroneously thus gaining a false knowledge.
Does 'seeing' make one infallible?