05-01-2012, 12:00 AM
Perhaps its only pointless to you because you do not care to delve deeper into the essence of what I'm saying... (a form of ignoring/ignorance)
QS may be stuck on the semantics of it, dont try to define the conversation so limitedly as to frame it as if it is only about semantics... (it is like she is trying to character assassinate the conversation because she wants to devalue it... why? afraid of being fallible?)
it takes courage to admit one is wrong... if you are caught in the trap of trying to appear infallible then I can see why you would want to paint the discussion in a negative light, as if the discussion is meaningless/worthless/ (who cares its only a pointless debate)... spoken like one who wants to cover up meaningful discourse/dialectics because they do not like the 'truth' that is surfacing...
QS may be stuck on the semantics of it, dont try to define the conversation so limitedly as to frame it as if it is only about semantics... (it is like she is trying to character assassinate the conversation because she wants to devalue it... why? afraid of being fallible?)
it takes courage to admit one is wrong... if you are caught in the trap of trying to appear infallible then I can see why you would want to paint the discussion in a negative light, as if the discussion is meaningless/worthless/ (who cares its only a pointless debate)... spoken like one who wants to cover up meaningful discourse/dialectics because they do not like the 'truth' that is surfacing...