04-08-2011, 12:00 AM
I meant how datura's old bf called her an ****. Ok, first I'll explain what happened. I just read a post where she called Carlos an ****, then I come here and read her post here about not wanting to be called one...standing her ground with bf on that. So I decided to ask her about Carlos...I saw later after you asked me about it that the way I typed it it was not clear. At the time I figured she'd make the connection. I did it because the timing seemed relevant...just reading a post of hers prior to this, so I felt it was an omen for her to self stalk that if she wants to.
And it was relevant for me too. I saw how easy it is for I or anyone to call someone an **** and it seems so very harmless, especially if they don't hear us. I've done it and I'm sure everyone has done it. But then if someone is calling us that and sending the intent to us that we should 'accept' their view, its a different feeling altogether. But looking at the intent of both, is it really that different? When I call someone an ****, I am not thinking about it being done to me, I am not feeling the intent "sent" to me. If I did think this, I would not do it. And so I though it fit the topic of petty tyrant in that its intent that needs to be examined.
And it was relevant for me too. I saw how easy it is for I or anyone to call someone an **** and it seems so very harmless, especially if they don't hear us. I've done it and I'm sure everyone has done it. But then if someone is calling us that and sending the intent to us that we should 'accept' their view, its a different feeling altogether. But looking at the intent of both, is it really that different? When I call someone an ****, I am not thinking about it being done to me, I am not feeling the intent "sent" to me. If I did think this, I would not do it. And so I though it fit the topic of petty tyrant in that its intent that needs to be examined.