12-02-2013, 12:00 AM
~
“In order to practice stalking and controlled folly, since
it is not a way to fool or chastise people or feel superior to them, one has to
be capable of laughing at oneself. Florinda said that one of the results of a
detailed recapitulation is genuine laughter upon coming face to face with the
boring repetition of one's self-esteem, which is at the core of all human
interaction.”
The words ‘stalking’ and ‘controlled folly’ get a lot of use,
yet if you keep to the simple quote as mentioned above, you’re on the right
track. It’s often said that, “So and so
is stalking the board, or stalking in chat, or stalking someone else, etc.,
etc.” Incorrect. This is ego and self importance from giver
and receiver. Keep in mind that ego and self
importance are smarter than ‘you,’ WAY smarter.
This needs repeating.
Your ego and self importance are smarter than ‘you,’ WAY
smarter.
Discussion boards, chats, the written or spoken word
anywhere is ego’s playground. All
stalking is self stalking. Being
concerned with another individual, lying in wait in any shape or form to point
anything out to them is ego and self importance.
The tool used in stalking is the recapitulation which will
be discussed in another post. Just
choose one thing in your self importance and begin. Don’t fret over terminology such as fixating
the assemblage point, moving it, seeing, ruthlessness, cunning, patience and
sweetness, Tulio and his antics, etc., etc.
Just choose one thing and get to the bottom of it. When you can get to the bottom of one thing
you’ll have gotten to the bottom of every-thing. This also need be repeated.
When you get to the bottom of one thing you’ll have gotten
to the bottom of every-thing.
…but don’t worry about that now, either. Just choose one thing in your self importance
and stalk it.
Controlled folly is employed with other people; yet don’t
concern yourself over that just yet either.
If you’ve yet to do any recapitulation, then you are just messing with
people and they may see you as a bit strange.
This ‘messing with people’ is what we often see in chat and on
discussion boards, not stalking or controlled folly. If you want to mess with people that’s fine,
just don’t label it stalking or controlled folly.
If anyone should get to the point in stalking and recapitulation
where one needs ‘another,’ then the stalker will glean from this other person
traits that need be self-stalked. That’s
it. Some may say that dealing with
others in a warrior’s way is controlled folly.
Let’s clear that up.
Think vehicles and destinations. Stalking/recapitulation of self is the
vehicle, the doing. Controlled folly is
the destination, the result. You can’t
‘do’ controlled folly. It’s the result
OF recapitulation and self stalking. If
you think you are stalking another, or performing controlled folly with another
then you are just messing with them.
Controlled folly emerges out of the empty self and then the end of the
quote above begins to make sense. “The
results of a detailed recapitulation is genuine laughter upon coming face to
face with the boring repetition of one's self-esteem, which is at the core of
all human interaction.”
Controlled folly such as Don Juan and others mention and
describe is performed once one has passed the barrier of the gateless gate, the
totality of self, and there is no use in discussing it here.
SHM
“In order to practice stalking and controlled folly, since
it is not a way to fool or chastise people or feel superior to them, one has to
be capable of laughing at oneself. Florinda said that one of the results of a
detailed recapitulation is genuine laughter upon coming face to face with the
boring repetition of one's self-esteem, which is at the core of all human
interaction.”
The words ‘stalking’ and ‘controlled folly’ get a lot of use,
yet if you keep to the simple quote as mentioned above, you’re on the right
track. It’s often said that, “So and so
is stalking the board, or stalking in chat, or stalking someone else, etc.,
etc.” Incorrect. This is ego and self importance from giver
and receiver. Keep in mind that ego and self
importance are smarter than ‘you,’ WAY smarter.
This needs repeating.
Your ego and self importance are smarter than ‘you,’ WAY
smarter.
Discussion boards, chats, the written or spoken word
anywhere is ego’s playground. All
stalking is self stalking. Being
concerned with another individual, lying in wait in any shape or form to point
anything out to them is ego and self importance.
The tool used in stalking is the recapitulation which will
be discussed in another post. Just
choose one thing in your self importance and begin. Don’t fret over terminology such as fixating
the assemblage point, moving it, seeing, ruthlessness, cunning, patience and
sweetness, Tulio and his antics, etc., etc.
Just choose one thing and get to the bottom of it. When you can get to the bottom of one thing
you’ll have gotten to the bottom of every-thing. This also need be repeated.
When you get to the bottom of one thing you’ll have gotten
to the bottom of every-thing.
…but don’t worry about that now, either. Just choose one thing in your self importance
and stalk it.
Controlled folly is employed with other people; yet don’t
concern yourself over that just yet either.
If you’ve yet to do any recapitulation, then you are just messing with
people and they may see you as a bit strange.
This ‘messing with people’ is what we often see in chat and on
discussion boards, not stalking or controlled folly. If you want to mess with people that’s fine,
just don’t label it stalking or controlled folly.
If anyone should get to the point in stalking and recapitulation
where one needs ‘another,’ then the stalker will glean from this other person
traits that need be self-stalked. That’s
it. Some may say that dealing with
others in a warrior’s way is controlled folly.
Let’s clear that up.
Think vehicles and destinations. Stalking/recapitulation of self is the
vehicle, the doing. Controlled folly is
the destination, the result. You can’t
‘do’ controlled folly. It’s the result
OF recapitulation and self stalking. If
you think you are stalking another, or performing controlled folly with another
then you are just messing with them.
Controlled folly emerges out of the empty self and then the end of the
quote above begins to make sense. “The
results of a detailed recapitulation is genuine laughter upon coming face to
face with the boring repetition of one's self-esteem, which is at the core of
all human interaction.”
Controlled folly such as Don Juan and others mention and
describe is performed once one has passed the barrier of the gateless gate, the
totality of self, and there is no use in discussing it here.
SHM