05-03-2008, 12:00 AM
The mind needs a story to fixate upon as a vehicle to traverse into areas outside of what is known to it, the fixation of what is known is so strong that pure
abstraction is often insufficient to break that fixation.
Once that new field of conceptualisation is arrived upon however, then it is time to abandon the vehicle and have a good look around at where we have been
delivered to.
Holding onto the story is the problem, not the techniques or the concepts but the personalisation and possession of a new perspective which was only meant
to deliver you to another point in order to break the previous fixation.
To break one fixation, fluid conceptual fixations must be created so we may see within multiples that have fragments from each, and by virtue of being
subject to multiplicity the mind collapses because reason cannot cope with the unknown factors within that equation.
The contradiction here is the terminology is needed; only but for a moment ,then we must squarely look at this terminology with that liquescent fluidity
that is our heritage, which we have lost.
Fixation itelf is shadow atttention to be fixated is to be trapped in an avenue of awareness, which is to lose access to a multilateral fluidity that
encompasses many dimensions, many perspectives, and is our true nature, our liquescence.
….. So it is in the letting go of the terminology where the major issue is at the moment. It is entrapping awareness because of the investment within that
understanding, because in reality there is no way to really understand how awareness and intent manifests the realities that present themselves, until one
sees.
To hook onto the abstract we borrow understanding from another in order to arrive at a point where that expansive abstract principle can be integrated
within our being in a genuine, holistic sense.
This dissolves the need for terminology and makes obselete the identification because the integrated knowing does not need to be held onto, it is simply
known. The problem with intelligence is that it can appropriate concepts and simply add them to its repertoire of 'the known', creating a more
inclusive fixation, which is nevertheless still linear and rigid because it is possessed and defended.
Lujan
abstraction is often insufficient to break that fixation.
Once that new field of conceptualisation is arrived upon however, then it is time to abandon the vehicle and have a good look around at where we have been
delivered to.
Holding onto the story is the problem, not the techniques or the concepts but the personalisation and possession of a new perspective which was only meant
to deliver you to another point in order to break the previous fixation.
To break one fixation, fluid conceptual fixations must be created so we may see within multiples that have fragments from each, and by virtue of being
subject to multiplicity the mind collapses because reason cannot cope with the unknown factors within that equation.
The contradiction here is the terminology is needed; only but for a moment ,then we must squarely look at this terminology with that liquescent fluidity
that is our heritage, which we have lost.
Fixation itelf is shadow atttention to be fixated is to be trapped in an avenue of awareness, which is to lose access to a multilateral fluidity that
encompasses many dimensions, many perspectives, and is our true nature, our liquescence.
….. So it is in the letting go of the terminology where the major issue is at the moment. It is entrapping awareness because of the investment within that
understanding, because in reality there is no way to really understand how awareness and intent manifests the realities that present themselves, until one
sees.
To hook onto the abstract we borrow understanding from another in order to arrive at a point where that expansive abstract principle can be integrated
within our being in a genuine, holistic sense.
This dissolves the need for terminology and makes obselete the identification because the integrated knowing does not need to be held onto, it is simply
known. The problem with intelligence is that it can appropriate concepts and simply add them to its repertoire of 'the known', creating a more
inclusive fixation, which is nevertheless still linear and rigid because it is possessed and defended.
Lujan