11-22-2005, 12:00 AM
(taking a relaxing pause on its journey to heroxtlan, floating lazily belly-up on the clear, tranquil waters of a wonderful recess of the river)
Nhaic. Kwestor, croco here is a bit confused perhaps you could help croco here to sort out its confusion (dont worry, croco wont bite you, nhac, nhac, nhac)
You said:
> -to convert IT into more of you, to have you inside IT, to fill it with you; to have no part of it that is not filled with you (your essence?).. to have in essence - no flyer
Er how do you propose to get yourself into it, to fill it with you, to have no part of it that is not filled with you, when you also said that it has no substance and that we can only speak of it metaphorically?
But assuming that we could do what you are saying what you are actually proposing, is to literally exterminate the predator. For if you fill it up totally with you to the point where there is no more predator, the predator ceased to exist as the individuality it was. It doesnt matter that it has changed, merged with you or whatever. The end result is that it will cease to be what it is. And it would have been you, whom would have brought about such ceasing of being. Therefore, the obvious question has to be asked: what different would you then be from the predator? You wouldnt be any better than it. For you would have done to it what you fear it to do to you, that is, to make you cease to be the individuality that you are, to kill you.
Is this your proposition for the challenges that Life lovingly throws into your path? To kill the opponent? To kill or be killed? The age old religious brain washing dementia of an eye for an eye? Havent you progressed, evolved any bit over that barbaric stage? Is that how much you value Life? How much you respect Life? Is that how far your present intellectual development and prowess allow you to go in tackling such a mighty challenge, as is the dealing with a predator? To fight it? To kill it? To exterminate it?
Havent you learn yet that Life never creates anything purposelessly, or uselessly and therefore if it created an entity such as the predator, a higher function and purpose that predator might have in the vast scheme of things? Or are your sights so short and clouded that your intellect isnt capable of distinguishing an elephant from an ant if it stands farther than two inches away from your eyes?
How can you talk and preach peace and freedom, when you are openly and irresponsibly suggesting and advocating such an abhorrent proposition of fight, war, death and extermination, huh?
Ah, my dear lad, how very little you understand of Life and of. Yourself and what you are. How very little indeed
Croco is indeed confused lets see you further said that:
> They have no understanding of true kindness either- they cannot co-exist with it because their intent cannot co-exist with it
So what are you actually saying here, huh? Croco always gets confused with ambiguities, so has to squeeze them until they give off all they have to give off. Lets see
By being kind to it, it will - again - cease to exist (since you say that it can not co-exist with kindness and since you said that we cannot talk about it other than metaphorically). No good solution to croco. If it exists, a reason must be for its existence and croco here for one, has no business playing God or whatever alike, determining what shall and what shall not continue to exist.
But it might be that you are hinting at a strategy to achive the feat of turning it into more of you, by filling it more and more with you until it is completely filled with you and hence it is no longer predator anymore. End result still the same, its extermination. Nope, no good to croco either. Croco here values and loves Life and ALL its manifestations in all its infinitely varied forms, shapes and flavors without exception, above anything else.
It might yet be that you are suggesting that by being kind to it, it will simply stir away from you, due to not being able to co-exist with kindness, in which case you are simply pushing it away from you and not harming it or intending to harm it in any way or manner. OK, if this is the case, croco can go along with it without any troubles at all. Good.
But it might yet be something else cant it, kwestor?
It might be that you are actually not considering the predator at all on this instance, but considering simply and strictly yourself. Reaching out shyly through the disguised cape of this sentence, to ask for kindness towards yourself kindness of being given what you feel you need the most clarification. And thats OK, you know we all need clarifications but honesty is always the best road and if you feel like needing clarification, all you have to do is to ask, you know
What? You fear the ridicule and the mockery that might be thrown at you, such a knowledgeable lad, for asking for clarification in a department where you pose yourself as being quite deeply experienced? Then, with all due respect, croco must tell you that you dont understand the first thing about the very subject you talk about so much: learning.
For only the imbeciles, the cretins and the highly ignorant indeed, ever mock and ridicule an individual who openly asks for clarification. For only an imbecile, a cretin and a downright ignorant individual fails to understand that the only real difference between any two individuals, is not their degree of knowledge or understanding about anything, but simply their degree of ignorance. For in Infinity, there is an infinite amount of knowledge to be grasped and therefore theres never the possibility of any individual ever coming to know or understand all that there is to be known or understood. Therefore, all individuals are always in a perennial state of ignorance in relation to whats still ahead of them to be known and understood. Only the degree of such ignorance varies between them, nothing else.
Theres no shame in asking for clarification. There is shame only when one feels the need of being clarified and doesnt have the courage to ask for the clarification. For that lack of courage is a blatant statement of the individuals fear and of the dimension of that individuals pride.
There might have been something else, though, that led you to make that statement about kindness, which you probably didnt consider. It might have not come from you at all. It might very well have come from something which loves you more than what you care to believe it possible, which understands better than yourself what is it that you might need - rather than want - at this very moment and therefore lovingly handled you into saying it, for it did know and understood that some fool out there might very well catch the appeal and accept to stretch out a helping hand. Not saying this was the case, huh just saying that the possibility exists for it to might have happened and therefore it would be unwise not to consider it
But then again, croco here is just a croco nhac, nhac
Anyway. As you can see, croco got indeed quite confused with this post of yours. Care to clarify croco? Thanks upfront, whatever your decision might be.
(rolling over itself lazily, enjoying the warm waters and the sunshine)
Croco
Nhaic. Kwestor, croco here is a bit confused perhaps you could help croco here to sort out its confusion (dont worry, croco wont bite you, nhac, nhac, nhac)
You said:
> -to convert IT into more of you, to have you inside IT, to fill it with you; to have no part of it that is not filled with you (your essence?).. to have in essence - no flyer
Er how do you propose to get yourself into it, to fill it with you, to have no part of it that is not filled with you, when you also said that it has no substance and that we can only speak of it metaphorically?
But assuming that we could do what you are saying what you are actually proposing, is to literally exterminate the predator. For if you fill it up totally with you to the point where there is no more predator, the predator ceased to exist as the individuality it was. It doesnt matter that it has changed, merged with you or whatever. The end result is that it will cease to be what it is. And it would have been you, whom would have brought about such ceasing of being. Therefore, the obvious question has to be asked: what different would you then be from the predator? You wouldnt be any better than it. For you would have done to it what you fear it to do to you, that is, to make you cease to be the individuality that you are, to kill you.
Is this your proposition for the challenges that Life lovingly throws into your path? To kill the opponent? To kill or be killed? The age old religious brain washing dementia of an eye for an eye? Havent you progressed, evolved any bit over that barbaric stage? Is that how much you value Life? How much you respect Life? Is that how far your present intellectual development and prowess allow you to go in tackling such a mighty challenge, as is the dealing with a predator? To fight it? To kill it? To exterminate it?
Havent you learn yet that Life never creates anything purposelessly, or uselessly and therefore if it created an entity such as the predator, a higher function and purpose that predator might have in the vast scheme of things? Or are your sights so short and clouded that your intellect isnt capable of distinguishing an elephant from an ant if it stands farther than two inches away from your eyes?
How can you talk and preach peace and freedom, when you are openly and irresponsibly suggesting and advocating such an abhorrent proposition of fight, war, death and extermination, huh?
Ah, my dear lad, how very little you understand of Life and of. Yourself and what you are. How very little indeed
Croco is indeed confused lets see you further said that:
> They have no understanding of true kindness either- they cannot co-exist with it because their intent cannot co-exist with it
So what are you actually saying here, huh? Croco always gets confused with ambiguities, so has to squeeze them until they give off all they have to give off. Lets see
By being kind to it, it will - again - cease to exist (since you say that it can not co-exist with kindness and since you said that we cannot talk about it other than metaphorically). No good solution to croco. If it exists, a reason must be for its existence and croco here for one, has no business playing God or whatever alike, determining what shall and what shall not continue to exist.
But it might be that you are hinting at a strategy to achive the feat of turning it into more of you, by filling it more and more with you until it is completely filled with you and hence it is no longer predator anymore. End result still the same, its extermination. Nope, no good to croco either. Croco here values and loves Life and ALL its manifestations in all its infinitely varied forms, shapes and flavors without exception, above anything else.
It might yet be that you are suggesting that by being kind to it, it will simply stir away from you, due to not being able to co-exist with kindness, in which case you are simply pushing it away from you and not harming it or intending to harm it in any way or manner. OK, if this is the case, croco can go along with it without any troubles at all. Good.
But it might yet be something else cant it, kwestor?
It might be that you are actually not considering the predator at all on this instance, but considering simply and strictly yourself. Reaching out shyly through the disguised cape of this sentence, to ask for kindness towards yourself kindness of being given what you feel you need the most clarification. And thats OK, you know we all need clarifications but honesty is always the best road and if you feel like needing clarification, all you have to do is to ask, you know
What? You fear the ridicule and the mockery that might be thrown at you, such a knowledgeable lad, for asking for clarification in a department where you pose yourself as being quite deeply experienced? Then, with all due respect, croco must tell you that you dont understand the first thing about the very subject you talk about so much: learning.
For only the imbeciles, the cretins and the highly ignorant indeed, ever mock and ridicule an individual who openly asks for clarification. For only an imbecile, a cretin and a downright ignorant individual fails to understand that the only real difference between any two individuals, is not their degree of knowledge or understanding about anything, but simply their degree of ignorance. For in Infinity, there is an infinite amount of knowledge to be grasped and therefore theres never the possibility of any individual ever coming to know or understand all that there is to be known or understood. Therefore, all individuals are always in a perennial state of ignorance in relation to whats still ahead of them to be known and understood. Only the degree of such ignorance varies between them, nothing else.
Theres no shame in asking for clarification. There is shame only when one feels the need of being clarified and doesnt have the courage to ask for the clarification. For that lack of courage is a blatant statement of the individuals fear and of the dimension of that individuals pride.
There might have been something else, though, that led you to make that statement about kindness, which you probably didnt consider. It might have not come from you at all. It might very well have come from something which loves you more than what you care to believe it possible, which understands better than yourself what is it that you might need - rather than want - at this very moment and therefore lovingly handled you into saying it, for it did know and understood that some fool out there might very well catch the appeal and accept to stretch out a helping hand. Not saying this was the case, huh just saying that the possibility exists for it to might have happened and therefore it would be unwise not to consider it
But then again, croco here is just a croco nhac, nhac
Anyway. As you can see, croco got indeed quite confused with this post of yours. Care to clarify croco? Thanks upfront, whatever your decision might be.
(rolling over itself lazily, enjoying the warm waters and the sunshine)
Croco