05-29-2010, 12:00 AM
We are here to become what can't be named Mornings Son
So much is assumed by this statement......We..here...something that cannot be named....and most of all the idea that we can become.
If anything this statement serves to highlight things that obscure. Mornings Son is suggesting that we can become that which cannot be named. He is not suggesting that we already are that. He has a definite idea of that which cannot be named and what he knows of it he thinks that we are not that also based on very definite ideas about what he thinks we are at present. If possible I think it might be helpful if we could explore this idea of "becoming". Is it actually possible, this kind of activity?
So much is assumed by this statement......We..here...something that cannot be named....and most of all the idea that we can become.
If anything this statement serves to highlight things that obscure. Mornings Son is suggesting that we can become that which cannot be named. He is not suggesting that we already are that. He has a definite idea of that which cannot be named and what he knows of it he thinks that we are not that also based on very definite ideas about what he thinks we are at present. If possible I think it might be helpful if we could explore this idea of "becoming". Is it actually possible, this kind of activity?