06-21-2010, 12:00 AM
Here's an interesting consideration on infinity. Following this same kind of logic being presented here, and it IS logic.
Its been said that the reason man has settled upon the theory of infinity is because he finds it more impossible to conceive of an absolute finity. Yet it is impossible for man to grasp both finity and infinity. One merely thinks they have apprehended infinity by "imagining" space without end. But to truly apprehend infinity would be impossible, an end could not be reached. So the mental imagining only implies "it is without end" without one actually being able to experience this directly.
So its important to note, that infinity has been settled upon because man finds it the lesser of two impossibilities: the finite and infinity. But how can there be a lesser impossible thing? If two things are impossible, they are equal in that impossibility. An impossible thing can be no greater or lesser than another impossible thing!
And this in not an argument to disprove infinity. But show that finity has been canceled out by a logic that in its very resting spot is illogical.
Its been said that the reason man has settled upon the theory of infinity is because he finds it more impossible to conceive of an absolute finity. Yet it is impossible for man to grasp both finity and infinity. One merely thinks they have apprehended infinity by "imagining" space without end. But to truly apprehend infinity would be impossible, an end could not be reached. So the mental imagining only implies "it is without end" without one actually being able to experience this directly.
So its important to note, that infinity has been settled upon because man finds it the lesser of two impossibilities: the finite and infinity. But how can there be a lesser impossible thing? If two things are impossible, they are equal in that impossibility. An impossible thing can be no greater or lesser than another impossible thing!
And this in not an argument to disprove infinity. But show that finity has been canceled out by a logic that in its very resting spot is illogical.

